Yeah, it does for news junkies like most of us are but remember, the average TV watcher puts more creedence in who's screwing who on Survivor than the validity of sources for Dan Rather. If Viacom's stock success is directly proportional to the credibility of their newscast then they have much worse problems to deal with.
Besides, what's more important here, CBS allegedly doing poor research on a topic few care about or all the US networks falling in line with the military during the war to provide only sanitized versions of what was going on? Let's get some perspective here.
Personally, I've never really cared for Dan Rather so I could care less how this all turns out. I really doubt anyone's vote will be influenced by the whole mess.
Current Events » in reply to CBS's 'Statement'
CBS news' credibility doesn't make for a hill of beans
The whole thread (23 posts)
- CBS's 'Statement'
- A blast from the past
- CBS news' credibility doesn't make for a hill of beans
- The Democrats Are Attacking Bush's Credibility & Demonstrating They Have None
- Is Kerry's camp even running a campaign, or are they just making it up as they go along?
- re: The Democrats Are Attacking Bush's Credibility & Demonstrating They Have None
- The Democrats Are Attacking Bush's Credibility & Demonstrating They Have None
- He does not say they are authentic, but 'accurate'
- Dan Rather and the secretary.
- For this crap we waited five extra hours?
