"A beacon of freedom". And talk about a flip-flop, that's costing lives.

Current Events » in reply to Bush's speech to the U.N.

"A beacon of freedom". And talk about a flip-flop, that's costing lives.

Bowser — 9/21/2004 5:05:56 PM (archived)

A beacon of freedom, that is, after he kills all of 'em that don't want to be free.

Now this is tragic. Bush then:

WASHINGTON/UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - President Bush on Thursday urged the U.S. Congress to authorize military action against Iraq, warning the United Nations Washington was prepared to go it alone, as Saddam Hussein accused Bush of lying to gain control of Middle East oil.

Bush today (keep in mind that Allawi is a puppet, and the "new" government will be, too):

â€œThe U.N. and its member nations must respond to Prime Minister Allawiâ€™s request and do more to help build an Iraq that is secure, democratic, federal and free,â€ Bush said.

The not even Shaquille O'Neal has a bigger flip-flop.

Arf

The whole thread (28 posts)

Bush's speech to the U.N. - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 4:12:59 PM
- Not TOO shabby - Tony - 9/21/2004 5:16:04 PM
- "A beacon of freedom". And talk about a flip-flop, that's costing lives. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 5:05:56 PM
  - The freedom you inherited cost lives. - REB - 9/21/2004 5:13:54 PM
    - American lives. And he's killing the ones that don't like a foreign army controlling the country. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 5:18:25 PM
      - Apparently Bowser's Missed The News About Who Is Deliberately Targeting Children, Women, & Civilians - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:45:55 AM
      - Calling American solders baby killers was hip during Vietnam. - REB - 9/21/2004 7:29:45 PM
      - "Killing the ones that want freedom?" Suggest engaging the front end of your brain before replying? - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 5:31:59 PM
        
        Since when is having your country controlled by a foreign army "freedom"? - Bowser - 9/21/2004 6:50:58 PM
        
        Q.E.D. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 7:05:51 PM
        
        proved what? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/21/2004 10:14:03 PM
        
        Follow the thread. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/22/2004 12:19:57 AM
        
        I'm not going to read it again to try to puzzle it out. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/22/2004 3:08:34 PM
        
        quod erat demonstrandum? - REB - 9/21/2004 7:10:50 PM
        
        Latin for That which was to be demonstrated - REB - 9/21/2004 7:22:23 PM
        
        That's what he regards as "freedom". Doesn't make sense to me, either. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/21/2004 7:20:02 PM
        
        What you don't understand is this is the path to freedom. - REB - 9/21/2004 7:25:38 PM
        
        Some people expect instant gratification - Larry J - 9/21/2004 8:39:37 PM
        
        You're trying to imply the US is on the side of the Iraqis. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 10:44:50 PM
        
        No Implying At All - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:02:37 AM
        
        What are you talking about? - REB - 9/21/2004 7:02:29 PM
        
        re: This... - Raoul - 9/21/2004 7:53:52 PM
        
        re: This... - REB - 9/21/2004 8:40:41 PM
        
        Raoul Has Yet To Admit We Attacked Germany Without "Provocation" Too - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:00:22 AM
        
        re: What would Churchill think about that? (n/t) - Raoul - 9/22/2004 5:49:57 AM
      - Still saying our solders are the bad guys. How sad. - REB - 9/21/2004 5:25:11 PM
        
        re: If Bush gets re-elected the dog will shift into "Its a genocide" mode. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 9/21/2004 5:29:46 PM
      - Sorta like killing Nazis in Germany, except a lot of the fighters are not Iraqi. - ebnelson - 9/21/2004 5:24:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)