Current Events » in reply to quod erat demonstrandum?

The whole thread (28 posts)

• Bush's speech to the U.N. - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 4:12:59 PM
  • Not TOO shabby - Tony - 9/21/2004 5:16:04 PM
  • "A beacon of freedom". And talk about a flip-flop, that's costing lives. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 5:05:56 PM
    • The freedom you inherited cost lives. - REB - 9/21/2004 5:13:54 PM
      • American lives. And he's killing the ones that don't like a foreign army controlling the country. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 5:18:25 PM
        • Apparently Bowser's Missed The News About Who Is Deliberately Targeting Children, Women, & Civilians - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:45:55 AM
        • Calling American solders baby killers was hip during Vietnam. - REB - 9/21/2004 7:29:45 PM
        • "Killing the ones that want freedom?" Suggest engaging the front end of your brain before replying? - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 5:31:59 PM
          • Since when is having your country controlled by a foreign army "freedom"? - Bowser - 9/21/2004 6:50:58 PM
            • Q.E.D. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/21/2004 7:05:51 PM
              • proved what? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/21/2004 10:14:03 PM
                • Follow the thread. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/22/2004 12:19:57 AM
                  • I'm not going to read it again to try to puzzle it out. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/22/2004 3:08:34 PM
              • quod erat demonstrandum? - REB - 9/21/2004 7:10:50 PM
                • Latin for That which was to be demonstrated - REB - 9/21/2004 7:22:23 PM
                • That's what he regards as "freedom". Doesn't make sense to me, either. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/21/2004 7:20:02 PM
                  • What you don't understand is this is the path to freedom. - REB - 9/21/2004 7:25:38 PM
                    • Some people expect instant gratification - Larry J - 9/21/2004 8:39:37 PM
                      • You're trying to imply the US is on the side of the Iraqis. - Bowser - 9/21/2004 10:44:50 PM
                        • No Implying At All - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:02:37 AM
            • What are you talking about? - REB - 9/21/2004 7:02:29 PM
              • re: This... - Raoul - 9/21/2004 7:53:52 PM
                • re: This... - REB - 9/21/2004 8:40:41 PM
                  • Raoul Has Yet To Admit We Attacked Germany Without "Provocation" Too - Mark Eby - 9/22/2004 2:00:22 AM
                    • re: What would Churchill think about that? (n/t) - Raoul - 9/22/2004 5:49:57 AM
        • Still saying our solders are the bad guys. How sad. - REB - 9/21/2004 5:25:11 PM
          • re: If Bush gets re-elected the dog will shift into "Its a genocide" mode. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 9/21/2004 5:29:46 PM
        • Sorta like killing Nazis in Germany, except a lot of the fighters are not Iraqi. - ebnelson - 9/21/2004 5:24:06 PM