Just the fact that Kerry handled them perfectly in respect to the average viewer to the debates. You spend hours per day looking up the stuff you do. You simply cannot judge this election through your eyes of the eyes of the bloggers your tend to read.
What did I say that you had to argue with? I stated that I thought Bush had brought up a valid point and scored in the debate. Then I simply said that Kerry had countered it brilliantly and that I couldn't vouch for the truth of the things he said.
You're putting your prejudices against Kerry in the minds of the voters that will be deciding this thing. I don't have that baggage because Kerry doesn't really resonate with me the way Bush does with you. Give up pal, you're outclassed by your own emotions. I don't know who's going to win, just that it'll be a horse race. You've had it all figured out from the day you thought GWB would be cool to have a beer with.
Current Events » in reply to "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
Tom, I wasn't arguing Bush's points
The whole thread (23 posts)
- "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- Tom, I wasn't arguing Bush's points
- re: "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- Amazing
- re: Why does Kerry think we need a bigger coalition vs. Iraq but then argue against a bigger coalition vs. North Korea?
- re: "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- re: You do realize thet Bush has put us ina very bad palce with the Six Country talks?...
- Excuse me but...
