You've got to be kidding: We need a coalition for war but a coalition causes confusion in negotiations?
Hello! I got news for you: A coalition causes confusion in war also...Remember the Canadians who got killed by freindly fire? How do polish troops on the ground communicate and coordinate their actions with Spanish troops who are at the same time coordinating with Canadians, and Turkish troops, who are all being covered by American Air Force and Army air cover forces?
You are admitting that the whole reason John Kerry, the French, and the UN beat "the coalition issue" to death in regards to Iraq is because they want to slow down the process of making real improvements in Iraq. They wanted the status quo: Sadam and his rapist sons in power.
Scott Evil
Current Events » in reply to Uh...Scott
re: Wrong. Why didn't we demand US WMD inspectors in Iraq then instead of UN WMD inspectors?
The whole thread (23 posts)
- "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- Tom, I wasn't arguing Bush's points
- re: "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- Amazing
- re: Why does Kerry think we need a bigger coalition vs. Iraq but then argue against a bigger coalition vs. North Korea?
- re: "Bilateral talks with North Korea"
- re: You do realize thet Bush has put us ina very bad palce with the Six Country talks?...
- Excuse me but...