Or don't you think the ROW can handle things like this?
I don't know who the worldwide critics of the U.S. think they're kidding. They know damn well the United Nations can't do jack about serious global threats, and that only the United States really has the resources for this. Anybody remember what got done in Bosnia before we showed up?
Their wet dream is American military might under the complete command of Kofi Annan. I bet the U.N. bureaucrats have already set up a little room in the U.N. building with maps, little plastic tanks, and those long sticks to move them around.
Anyway, what would you propose Bush, had he never attacked Iraq, do about Iran? The usual U.N. rounds of "summits" have done very little except make the mullahs laugh until they choke.
Maybe we should have invaded Iran instead? Would you have supported that?
Or is it a lot simpler? No matter what Bush does, it's wrong?
Current Events » in reply to While George "Nero" Bush FIddles...
I'm sorry. I thought the U.N. had Iran under control.
The whole thread (25 posts)
- While George "Nero" Bush FIddles...
- An earlier statement by Rafsanjani...
- Go, Herr Goebells! (n/t)
- Ok, I'm gonna get it from both sides on this one. lol
- re: So what exactly does George Bush have to do with Iran's missile program?
- I'm sorry. I thought the U.N. had Iran under control.
- that ole "Axis of Evil" stirring up again?
- So, are you on record as supporting an invasion of Iran if we were not in Iraq? (n/t)
