re: Bush's sending mixed signals was hard work.

Current Events » in reply to Question on the "Global Test."

Chris Vancil — 10/5/2004 9:19:45 PM (archived)

I doubt it is what you would like it to be.

I think it was a mistake. Similar to the forty or fifty times Bush said being president is hard hard hard work (while looking like he really needed a nap). Or Bush's sending mixed signals thru out the debate.

The whole thread (27 posts)

Question on the "Global Test." - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 4:05:47 PM
- Now I get it. It's not the French who need to approve. It's the Martians. - Tom Brosz - 10/6/2004 12:07:59 AM
- re: Bush's sending mixed signals was hard work. - Chris Vancil - 10/5/2004 9:19:45 PM
- Sure: poor choice of words - alcaray - 10/5/2004 8:41:49 PM
  - re: Kerry is accusing the US of Commiting a war crime by invading Iraq??? - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 10:14:16 PM
    - No. The question was about future actions, wasn't it? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/5/2004 10:53:03 PM
- re: Question on the "Global Test." - Publius - 10/5/2004 7:48:56 PM
  - re: You want the Truth? I'll give you the Truth. - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 8:00:31 PM
- re: Invading Iraq had nothing to do with your security - Raoul - 10/5/2004 7:09:21 PM
  - re: By your definition, Bin Ladin isn't a threat to the US either. - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 7:54:29 PM
    - "We"? Speak for yourself. - alcaray - 10/5/2004 9:03:32 PM
      - re: Please define what is a threat if Sadam was not a threat... - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 10:12:39 PM
        
        Kim, if he really has nukes is a threat. Iran, if and when... - alcaray - 10/5/2004 10:55:52 PM
  - Yes, it did. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/5/2004 7:39:45 PM
- One line says it all. - Tony - 10/5/2004 4:58:26 PM
  - Who decides if the "proof" is sufficient? - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 6:00:00 PM
    - Since you're fixated on two words let me give you another - Tony - 10/5/2004 6:10:32 PM
      - re: two words - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 6:23:30 PM
        
        re: "So, before you go in you have to prove why you did it first?" - alcaray - 10/5/2004 8:46:03 PM
        
        Yes, but Kerry wasn't talking about "Americans" was he? - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 11:33:22 PM
        
        you guys are gonna say what you guys are gonna say (n/t) - alcaray - 10/5/2004 11:39:07 PM
        
        No - Tony - 10/5/2004 7:00:32 PM
  - re: So was Sadam's refusal to cooperate with Weapons inspectors - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 5:47:55 PM
- re: This is the beauty of the Kerry doctrine. - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 4:17:13 PM
  - Typical Kerry: All sides of all issues. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 10/5/2004 4:38:36 PM
- Belmont Club - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 4:12:15 PM
  - re: Keep Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheny in charge... - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 4:21:03 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (27 posts)