One line says it all.
"you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons"
In other words, don't go invading countries when the reasons you give ain't legitimate.
But keep plugging away at it, it seems to be the only thing the blog-myopics took away from the debate.
They could be more effectively attacking Kerry over NK or bunker busters, but that would require actually going into detail rather than focussing on two words that give an impression of flipfloppery/giving the ROW a veto, when he actually said no such thing.
But hey, you're convinced everything he says has no meaning, so why pick on this?