Telling voters they can't vote without ID when they can.
Telling people who are not ex-felons that they are, and are ineligible to vote, and placing the burden of proof on the citizens on the day of the election.
If these things happen again on Election Day, and voters are turned away who haven't the knowledge to understand their disenfranchisement is unlawful, it's too late.
This horrible "pre-emptive strike" is voter education. Why would any Republican, Democrat, third party member, or independent be against voter education? Would voters ignorant of their rights and of the law benefit any particular group?
Also: this was a Democratic action manual, with phraseology meant for activists, who understand that politics is war waged in words and ideas. It wasn't a press release. Who put in the national news, hmm? Could they have had ulterior motives for this, such as taking attention away from THE PRESIDENT'S RECORD?
Current Events » in reply to Can you read this
A pattern has emerged.
The whole thread (26 posts)
- Kerrykrats break out another page from Mein Kampf: Make False Charges
- A prudent course of action, after Florida 2000
- I'd wait on this one.
- Another example of not being able to read
- No wonder most folks hate the CE board. This one's a classic (n/t)
