Make up your mind, is it okay or not. If it is a forgery it is a dirty trick but it can't be fine and dandy and also a dirty trick. You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too.
"And the document doesn't say it is happening or is going to happen, just that it might and that people should be aware of the possibility."
That is just not true. It says, whether or not any intimidation has occurred or not, launch a pre-emptive strike presuming that it has happened.
Note that it is particularly well suited (but not exclusively suited) for areas where intimidation has happened in the past
If you don't have a problem with that fine. I suppose that it is also okay for republicans to launch a similar strike implying dead voters, felon voters and multiple votes, in the absence of any supporting evidence beyond the fact that this technique has been used by dems in the past.
I am not afraid of anything political but I am sickened by the hypocrisy
Current Events » in reply to Funny, conservatives having a problem with the concept of preemptive strike...
If you question the veracity of the document, fine
The whole thread (26 posts)
- Kerrykrats break out another page from Mein Kampf: Make False Charges
- A prudent course of action, after Florida 2000
- I'd wait on this one.
- Another example of not being able to read
- No wonder most folks hate the CE board. This one's a classic (n/t)
