"(which I think are mostly uncoordinated, but I could be wrong). Should Bush take another squeeker amid disputed circumstances...well, I dunno. At a minimum, we'd face four extremely bitter years."
I doubt it will be a squeaker.
And if Bush is elected I doubt we will face "four extremely bitter years".
Remember MSM doesn't get paid to inform the reader. If it "bleeds it leads" and "man bites dog" is the content of MSM. It's a close election because MSM is running stories of a close election- for variety every once in a while they run a story about it being a blow out. And then they claim the electorate is volatile and in the same breath say we have results like in 2000.
Bush goes to Florida and fills a stadium, and Kerry goes and gets a couple hundred.
The Press yearns for disaster; Kerry is a disaster.
Current Events » in reply to Could be right
re: Could be right
The whole thread (26 posts)
- Do you think that there will be widespread violence in America, regardless of who wins the election?
- In a single word: NO. I don't expect any violence. (n/t)
- A good question. If the Rs steal it again, there could be problems.
- With 'The Guardian' in the UK openly asking for assasins, and John Edwards' wife saying that there won't be violence if the dems win, I don't know anymore.
- re: Nah... No violence.
- re: Do you think that there will be widespread violence in America, regardless of who wins the election?