Current Events » in reply to Who was Zarqawi BEFORE this war?

The whole thread (37 posts)

• Fallujah - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 5:29:36 PM
  • More Bilal Hussein photos - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 9:47:02 PM
    • Except for the few photos of insurgents, he would have you believe Americans are targeting civilians. - ebnelson - 11/8/2004 11:05:45 PM
      • More "Propaganda crap from the Islamo-fascists." - Lindy - 11/9/2004 4:04:55 PM
        • Then Nazis who resisted the occuptaion were insurgents - ebnelson - 11/9/2004 5:16:59 PM
          • Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 nor were they an immediate threat to the US - Lindy - 11/9/2004 5:39:10 PM
            • So we let them bomb us first? - ebnelson - 11/9/2004 7:20:15 PM
              • There has been plenty of time to locate Saddam's plans for pre-emptive strike against the US (guffaw!) (n/t) - alcaray - 11/9/2004 10:11:09 PM
        • re: Propaganda crap - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 4:51:58 PM
          • Who was Zarqawi BEFORE this war? - Lindy - 11/9/2004 5:46:39 PM
            • re: Who was Zarqawi BEFORE this war? He was Al Qaeda's man to Baghdad, that is who. (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/9/2004 7:21:30 PM
            • If we had never invaded Iraq, Zarqawi would be cutting heads off in Afghanistan. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 6:28:48 PM
    • "Pretty much what you'd expect" - what do you mean, Tom? - LJ - 11/8/2004 10:03:25 PM
      • This. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 10:16:24 PM
        • Saws versus 500 lb. bombs........... - Lindy - 11/9/2004 4:06:37 PM
          • Tell ya what, Lindy. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 4:57:19 PM
            • Apples and Oranges - Lindy - 11/9/2004 5:50:03 PM
              • Action vs inaction - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 6:23:27 PM
                • I hope nobody notices the arrows clutched in the American Eagles claw - alcaray. - 11/11/2004 12:43:50 AM
                  • You see those as equivalent? Cripes. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/11/2004 2:25:35 AM
                    • I see them both as a symbol of warlikeness that should not be used to infer specific intentions. In that respect, equivalent. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/11/2004 5:10:24 PM
                      • Let me make sure I get this straight... - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2004 4:07:11 AM
                        • I said exactly what I meant twice before: no intent can be inferred from either symbol. - alcaray - 11/12/2004 4:34:45 PM
                • Was it worth a shot? - Lindy - 11/10/2004 4:21:27 AM
              • re: Look in a mirror - Scott Evil - 11/9/2004 6:02:03 PM
        • re: This. - LJ - 11/8/2004 10:27:16 PM
          • Just something to keep in mind. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 10:35:34 PM
  • My guess is that most of the terrorists have fled. I have the suspicion that the USA is hitting empty targets. - David F Mayer - 11/8/2004 6:41:28 PM
    • To win, the insurgents have only to not lose---run away,fight another day........... (n/t) - Publius - 11/9/2004 5:11:29 PM
    • Are you suggesting that it's the equivalent of hitting jelly with a sledgehammer? (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 11/9/2004 4:34:19 PM
      • Good analogy........... - Lindy - 11/9/2004 5:51:25 PM
    • Belmont Club's take on this - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 9:14:23 PM
      • remember the lesson of Viet Nam...... - Publius - 11/9/2004 8:41:33 PM
        • You don't need popular support if you have fear. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2004 9:32:21 PM
    • I'd like to think the Marines have thought of that. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2004 7:33:08 PM
      • On "getting treatrment" for the "slippery bastards"............. - Lindy - 11/9/2004 4:19:30 PM
        • . (n/t) - . - 11/12/2004 4:13:41 PM