Your dogmatism is that human produced CO2 is causing global warming. Nothing else even seems to matter.
Not an increase in solar activity.
Not geologic evidence of past warming and cooling cycles even before human beings existed.
That is hardly scientific any more than those who cling to creationism. It's more a religious belief.
For the record:
Q. Is the climate warming?
My answer: Almost certainly. The Earth has warmed and cooled many times throughout geologic history. Why would now be an exception?
Q. Is human activity responsible for the current warming?
My answer: Perhaps for a portion of it. However, it evidence is hardly conclusive that we're solely responsible.
Take off your ideological blinders and look at the broader picture. You're quick to try to shout down anyone who dares question your religion. Sorry, but I'm not buying what you're selling. True science demands rigorous debate of all evidence, not religious arguments.
Current Events » in reply to DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST?!
And again, your dogmatism means you're unable to even consider the points that I made
The whole thread (38 posts)
- GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER
- Oh yeah - and Iran must be doing its part to end global warming by developing nuclear electirc power plants
- re: GLOBAL WARMING-
- Thanks. Now for a reply.
- Thanks. Now for a reply.
- re: It looks like the Methane and CO2 are keeping the tempatures from plunging to previously unseen lows.
- re: re. We don't care ... We're Americans!
- re: It looks like the Methane and CO2 are keeping the tempatures from plunging to previously unseen lows.
- You were one of the 'truly stupid' I was talking about
- Hardly a scienfic response
- Dogmatic
- He was doing what I predicted the truly stupid will do...
- see my other response... that better larry? (n/t)
- Not much
- I NEVER said that humans or even CO2 were the ONLY influence on climate- typical of you to rephrase what I am saying to make it possible to attack me.
- DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST?!
- Did you look at RL's information, Larry?
- Not much
- Hardly a scienfic response
