Current Events » in reply to And again, your dogmatism means you're unable to even consider the points that I made

The whole thread (38 posts)

• GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER - R.L. - 11/17/2004 9:44:47 PM
  • Oh yeah - and Iran must be doing its part to end global warming by developing nuclear electirc power plants - E.P. Grondine - 11/18/2004 4:03:35 PM
  • re: GLOBAL WARMING- - gbaikie - 11/18/2004 6:03:16 AM
  • Thanks. Now for a reply. - David F Mayer - 11/18/2004 1:02:15 AM
    • The effects of particulates are indeed complicated. - alcaray - 11/18/2004 6:55:36 PM
    • Also I believe there is a documented INCREASE in phytoplankton- not a decrease as you hypothesized... - R.L. - 11/18/2004 1:43:44 AM
    • First off thanks for a somewhat thoughtful reply - R.L. - 11/18/2004 1:34:15 AM
      • re: First off thanks for a somewhat thoughtful reply - David F Mayer - 11/18/2004 3:13:44 PM
        • re: First off thanks for a somewhat thoughtful reply - Davin L. - 11/18/2004 4:05:42 PM
  • Thanks. Now for a reply. - David F Mayer - 11/18/2004 1:02:13 AM
    • re: Thanks. Now for a reply. - Davin L. - 11/18/2004 3:59:10 PM
  • re: It looks like the Methane and CO2 are keeping the tempatures from plunging to previously unseen lows. - Scott Evil - 11/17/2004 9:54:18 PM
    • re: re. We don't care ... We're Americans! - Scott Asshole - 11/17/2004 10:47:21 PM
    • re: It looks like the Methane and CO2 are keeping the tempatures from plunging to previously unseen lows. - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:13:28 PM
      • re: I won't be satisfied until we hit 1500 ppm - Scott Evil - 11/18/2004 4:58:34 PM
    • You were one of the 'truly stupid' I was talking about - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:05:41 PM
      • Hardly a scienfic response - Larry J - 11/17/2004 10:18:04 PM
        • Dogmatic - LJ - 11/17/2004 10:30:58 PM
          • That's a pretty silly argument - Larry J - 11/17/2004 11:01:59 PM
            • The ending of ice ages coincides with increased CO2! - R.L. - 11/18/2004 12:46:20 AM
            • I never mentioned anything about mars- what does that have to do with anything?! - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:05:49 PM
              • Just proves you ignored my point - Larry J - 11/17/2004 11:13:35 PM
                • Changes in solar output have been studied and cannot account for the warming... does that address your irrelavent reference to mars? (n/t) - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:28:17 PM
                • No you are bringing up an irrelavent point, I could bring up venus, where a runaway greenhouse effect has taken hold due to these greenhouse gasses - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:21:16 PM
        • He was doing what I predicted the truly stupid will do... - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:23:02 PM
        • see my other response... that better larry? (n/t) - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:18:58 PM
          • Not much - Larry J - 11/17/2004 10:30:37 PM
            • I NEVER said that humans or even CO2 were the ONLY influence on climate- typical of you to rephrase what I am saying to make it possible to attack me. - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:45:41 PM
            • DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST?! - R.L. - 11/17/2004 10:38:55 PM
              • And again, your dogmatism means you're unable to even consider the points that I made - Larry J - 11/17/2004 10:53:01 PM
                • You are absolutely amazing in your desire to ignore the facts - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:03:02 PM
                  • And yet you keep harping on CO2 to the exclusion of everything else - Larry J - 11/17/2004 11:08:22 PM
                    • You apparently cant read graphs, All discussing this with you has proven is that I had WAY too high an estimation of your intellectual integrity... - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:27:00 PM
                      • re: If we graph methane and CO2, then we see that methan and CO2 are correlated...lets fix that problem 1st! - Scott Evil - 11/18/2004 5:11:32 PM
                • re: Stupidity rules ... We're Americans! - Larry Asshole - 11/17/2004 10:58:36 PM
                  • Posting under someone else's name is the act of a coward - Larry J - 11/17/2004 11:07:34 PM
                    • AGREED. CUT IT OUT - R.L. - 11/17/2004 11:40:04 PM
            • Did you look at RL's information, Larry? - LJ - 11/17/2004 10:32:35 PM