I commented about a few separate details about Cuba (ones that are often applied as litmus tests to determine the Communosity of a political opponent). You changed the topic to the net of all changes (many many many of which I left out of my discussion). In short, you changed it to a discussion of whether communist Cuba is good or bad. If you backtrack to my post and make the assumption that I was having that same conversation, then you can easily make it look like I was making a case that Castro's Cuba is good. Only problem is that I was not. Typical right-wing distortion, though.
Improved standards: quantity and quality of food, quantity and quality of work, quantity and quality of medical care. You try working on a sugar plantation for someone who thinks slavery got a bad rap some time.
Current Events » in reply to No. It isn't.
Yes it is.
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Castro is in big trouble now - Cuba has oil
- Our neo-cons liked Batista even without oil.
- Do think that Castro is better than Batista?
- Our lefties don't mind Castro oppressing, jailing and killing tens of thousands of his own people
- can you link me to a supporting thread? (n/t)
- Really? You seem to be informed, but are going to ask for links showing Castro is a tyrant?
- Next: alcaray wants links showing Republicans like tax cuts. (n/t)
- re: I can think of 'a' good thread... make that actual people/familIES. (n/t)
- re: I can think of 'a' good thread... make that actual people/familIES.
- According to the LEFT, tyranny is only real when right-wing tyrants are involved. (n/t)
- can you link me to a supporting thread? (n/t)
- Oh come on
- re: Castro is in big trouble now - Cuba has oil
- Old news.
- Our neo-cons liked Batista even without oil.