"Also turning down 1million dollars is not that big of a deal these days- especially when you consider how accepting the offer might affect book sales and the TV movie rights."

This is a contingent argument, and thus impossible to prove true or false. Common sense would tell us, however, that he will be the object of the same number of story rights either way.

I don't know about you- but 1,000,000 is a LOT of money, at least for me.

"As far as the "10 million" dollar offer, Tony has already astutely pointed out that Felos is a lawyer and therefore not objectionable, ie- smoke and mirrors."

I'm sorry, this makes no sense to me. How do we get from Felos is a lawyer, to 'not objectionable' and on to 'ie, smoke and mirrors'

And FWIW, the "Head" tag is not nonsense in HTML.

Inside an 'ol' tag, yes it is nonsense.

"At the time Mr. Schaivo petitioned to remove Terri's feeding tube, Terri's estate was worth $713,000. Financial incentive enough. Also, how credible was Mr. Schaivo, his brother's, and his sister-in-laws testimony?

"

And now its worth nothing, and MS was STILL trying to get the tube removed.

It was and is his right. We have no business in this business.

As to the Richard Pearse Report:

The ONLY grounds that it questions the witdrawl of life support was the existence of the Cash settlement still of value at that time. NOT any sort of real questions regarding the status of TS, or that she is in a PVS. There WAS NO MONEY (or nearly none) as of 2005.

Basically, I feel what you have done here is run in and throw out some unsubstantiated questions with no real meat to them in the current context and time. I don't think thats Kosher.

Davin L.