Arguing with you is like trying to pick up a bowling ball with a fork.
If you want to call the points about the million dollar deals "bullshit" then fine, I was smashed at the time anyway.
But for you not to concede that your point of "No money left in 2005" is total bullshit when the facts are that MS, after 4 years of trying to keep his wife alive, suddenly decided it was time for her to go after he got the settlement in 1998.
The ONLY grounds that it questions the witdrawl of life support was the existence of the Cash settlement still of value at that time
No, that's only half of it. The other half is MS observed change in behavior after the money came down and that MS was the sole heir to the cash settlement.
Current Events » in reply to Then prove it or present an argument. otherwise its just Bullshit on your part
You're really starting to chap my hide.
