Everyone has their down-cycles and up-cycles. Except Tom... Who pumps out so much material that he ends up with a sum of averages on a daily basis.
As for 'key players of annoyance', we have a few, but really no more than I can count on 2 hands.... With probably 40-50 regular and simi-regulars, thats not too bad.
I agree the place has gone down hill since the lead up to the Iraq war. But so has discourse in this country in general.
I have big issues with how some things are handled here, but I'm just one voice in the woods, and probably about a dozen other people would disagree with what I think the problems, and problem people are.
Right now, I do think the zone is in a definate down cycle, but as late as a couple of months ago, it was pretty good.
I have some thoughts on psuedoscience and moderation and actually determining whats the case and whats not the case WRT the ground rules of this board. I posted them before to little comment, don't know if I'll bother posting them again
D
Flame » in reply to It is not what it was
I don't remember Dan as so much above the fray
The whole thread (45 posts)
- The Neurotics Zone?
- re: The Neurotics Zone?
- Yes, I know. It was soooo much better when you were not here. (n/t)
- It is not what it was
- I still love you man! Sniff.
- I don't remember Dan as so much above the fray
- I don't think that word means what you think it does.
- "demonstrably false"
- My knowledge of it extends far beyond, say, your grasp of the notion of Irony
- Dead wrong on your definition, 50% wrong on your analysis, and quite revealing.
- I don't think that word means what you think it does.
- Dan attempted to insult me, several times. (n/t)
- A lot of those were funny........
- Don't forget, "Mostly Brosz" is still "slightly everybody else." (n/t)
- You can always leave
- Ah, one I forgot...The (n/t) depth of comments Zone? (n/t)
- If you feel the zone has no worth, then don't let the screen door... (n/t)