Flame » in reply to No, that post doesn't even remotely address my points. So as far as I'm concerned, they stand.

The whole thread (45 posts)

• The Neurotics Zone? - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/7/2005 7:51:53 PM
  • re: The Neurotics Zone? - Robert - 4/9/2005 4:34:21 AM
  • Yes, I know. It was soooo much better when you were not here. (n/t) - Davin L. - 4/9/2005 3:10:45 AM
    • Different personalities - Lindy - 4/9/2005 5:10:12 PM
      • stop manufaturing 'What I Think' - DL - 4/11/2005 4:31:38 AM
        • "I'm done with you Lindy" - Lindy - 4/11/2005 3:48:25 PM
          • re: "I'm done with you Lindy" - DL - 4/11/2005 9:30:04 PM
            • Brief reply - Lindy - 4/14/2005 12:33:41 AM
              • the brass tacks - . - 4/14/2005 8:38:05 PM
  • It is not what it was - FrankC - 4/8/2005 6:17:38 PM
    • I still love you man! Sniff. - RobVG - 4/9/2005 4:33:27 AM
      • Justin - FrankC - 4/9/2005 3:49:22 PM
    • I don't remember Dan as so much above the fray - Davin L. - 4/8/2005 8:27:25 PM
      • I don't think that word means what you think it does. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/8/2005 11:48:29 PM
        • "demonstrably false" - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2005 2:30:26 AM
          • Historical footnote - Fox - 4/11/2005 12:16:49 AM
          • See post below to Alcaray. (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 3:13:50 AM
            • Where he redefines the word to exclude himself. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/9/2005 6:58:40 PM
          • very well put - Davin L. - 4/9/2005 2:44:08 AM
        • My knowledge of it extends far beyond, say, your grasp of the notion of Irony - DL - 4/9/2005 1:51:35 AM
          • Again...see below. (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 3:15:11 AM
            • No, that post doesn't even remotely address my points. So as far as I'm concerned, they stand. (n/t) - DL - 4/9/2005 3:43:52 AM
              • Also does not rise to my challenge for you to post your so-called proof. (n/t) - DL - 4/9/2005 4:06:18 AM
          • other posts on this, to save re-typing - DL - 4/9/2005 2:28:17 AM
        • Dead wrong on your definition, 50% wrong on your analysis, and quite revealing. - alcaray - 4/9/2005 12:54:11 AM
          • Not at all. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 3:12:03 AM
            • Ear Candles: the very epitome of proof of concept - DL - 4/9/2005 3:59:24 AM
              • Proof of what? - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 4:26:35 AM
                • Yes, being "Director" of a real HonestToGod bigtime Quantum Physics Lab is soooo taxing - DL - 4/9/2005 4:29:51 AM
                  • Don't mention taxing in jest..April 15th is coming. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 4:44:48 AM
                    • oooookay SDAI.... (n/t) - DL - 4/9/2005 4:45:53 AM
              • relevant sections under FAQ, FYI (n/t) - DL - 4/9/2005 4:06:53 AM
            • and you are down to niggling over definitions to try to defend your self - DL - 4/9/2005 3:42:49 AM
              • I give up. You win. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/9/2005 4:16:05 AM
                • Davin makes some good points........ - Lindy - 4/9/2005 6:18:37 AM
                • that you invoke Mary Anne is really just down right bizzare - Davin L. - 4/9/2005 4:25:18 AM
    • Dan attempted to insult me, several times. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/8/2005 7:10:35 PM
      • Guess I missed it - FrankC - 4/8/2005 8:59:19 PM
  • A lot of those were funny........ - Lindy - 4/8/2005 4:18:55 AM
  • Don't forget, "Mostly Brosz" is still "slightly everybody else." (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2005 3:32:12 AM
  • You can always leave - fRiendLy suggestion - 4/7/2005 11:47:20 PM
  • Ah, one I forgot...The (n/t) depth of comments Zone? (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/7/2005 10:07:56 PM
    • Some of us don't need 4 pages to say what's needful n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/7/2005 10:16:09 PM
      • Obviously. (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/7/2005 10:20:34 PM
  • If you feel the zone has no worth, then don't let the screen door... (n/t) - alcaray - 4/7/2005 9:25:48 PM