"Now if you want a detailed analysis"
No Eddie - I want YOUR reasons for thinking that man tended lunar observatories are the best way to find NEO / Impact threats.
"finding these things with adequate warning time is very very very difficult."
Is that a typo?
You've been pimping the concept for months - surely you must know exactly why it's such a good idea to want to promote it so much - your answers should be instant and case-making.
How about 1 week. You can have 1 week to gather your thoughts and tell us all why you so strongly support the concept of man tended observatories on the moon to discover NEO and other impact threats.
If you cant provide a water tight argument for your case in that time - then you have no case, the issue is closed and the whole chapter can be put to bed, safe in the knowledge of what we know all along...you're full of shit :)
Doug
Flame » in reply to Simple answer
re: Simple answer
The whole thread (55 posts)
- EP's Man tended obsession
- re: EP's Man tended obsession
- It is a win-win-win-win-win stratetgy, Doug
- re: It is a win-win-win-win-win stratetgy, Doug
- re: It is a win-win-win-win-win stratetgy, Doug
- no one...
- re: no one...
- Peiser Is A E-mail Poster Not An Engineer
- You people are lying cowards
- Really?
- re: Well so are you!
- re: You people are lying cowards
- please, please, please, please go f**k yourselves
- stop passing the buck
- Okay, but I want more people to see it when I humiliate you
- Clearly I have to repeat myself
- Okay, but I want more people to see it when I humiliate you
- stop passing the buck
- please, please, please, please go f**k yourselves
- You people are lying cowards
- no one...
- re: EP's Man tended obsession
- A point I've been wondering about myself.
- this could easily sit on the Space board
