Off Topic » in reply to Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory

The whole thread (37 posts)

• Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory - SDF - 8/31/2005 7:43:46 PM
  • And still they get it wrong: God doesn't push down... - Robert - 8/31/2005 10:01:44 PM
    • re: the Earth sucks, So It Is Written On The Bathroom Wall. - Johannes - 9/1/2005 5:10:26 AM
      • Don't use the terms when you don't have a clue as to what they mean - R.L. - 9/1/2005 6:28:33 AM
        • re: when you don't have a clue as to what they mean? - Johannes - 9/1/2005 10:35:28 PM
          • One example - ModBob - 9/2/2005 8:43:39 AM
            • re: Interesting - Johannes - 9/2/2005 10:37:13 PM
              • re: ""C" = constant = 0 = reference point" - DL - 9/2/2005 10:51:20 PM
                • re: Hmmm.............. - Johannes - 9/3/2005 3:22:32 AM
                  • Ok.... - R.L. - 9/4/2005 5:30:12 AM
                    • re: Ok.... - Johannes - 9/6/2005 4:43:31 AM
                      • "explaining" the speed of light to a laser tech. Funny stuff! Keep it coming! (n/t) - alcaray - 9/7/2005 11:57:42 PM
                        • I am used to it.... - R.L. - 9/8/2005 4:18:25 AM
                          • Just spotted this... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/9/2005 8:44:30 AM
                        • re: Another congregation member? - Johannes - 9/8/2005 1:24:33 AM
                          • Man, I would hate to be your auto mechanic. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/8/2005 3:32:14 PM
                          • No, he can just spot BS... (n/t) - R.L. - 9/8/2005 4:19:57 AM
                  • Johannes, I have long since given up trying to correct you - DL - 9/3/2005 4:50:28 PM
                    • Late to the party - Mary Anne (moderator) - 9/6/2005 5:25:16 PM
                      • I think I'll just forgo posting in response to him - DL - 9/7/2005 12:13:59 AM
                        • Why? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2005 1:48:14 AM
                          • Indeed, you are right MA, and I am just ill tempered as of late - DL - 9/7/2005 3:38:19 AM
                    • re: And I thought you were the smarter one in the family. - Johannes - 9/4/2005 3:00:47 AM
                      • You thought wrong - DL - 9/5/2005 5:46:24 PM
                        • re: Look DL and RL - Johannes - 9/6/2005 6:01:46 AM
                          • re: Look DL and RL - DL - 9/6/2005 1:16:03 PM
                            • re: Despite what he says, your brother IS the smarter one in your family. (n/t) - Johannes - 9/7/2005 4:25:11 AM
                              • Its so cute to see you trying to spar with me. - DL - 9/7/2005 3:16:33 PM
                                • re: My mistake, I admit I'm not perfect, I was under the impression that the post was from RL :-] (n/t) - Johannes - 9/7/2005 6:06:46 PM
                      • I think you have an interesting hypothesis, but let's approach it from a different angle shall we - SDF - 9/4/2005 1:28:28 PM
                        • re: Thank you SDF, your intelligent answers and questions are much appreciated. - Johannes - 9/5/2005 11:57:20 PM
                        • It raises questions I think, about a quantum theory of gravity, but not religion - SDF - 9/4/2005 1:55:35 PM
                          • It raises NOTHING - R.L. - 9/5/2005 1:56:50 AM
                            • The original post is nonsense. But optical physics is not nonsense. (n/t) - SDF - 9/5/2005 5:05:27 AM
                              • Oh? - R.L. - 9/8/2005 1:09:09 AM
                            • Well, maybe R.L.'s ire... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2005 5:03:32 AM
      • ***Thread moved*** - ModBob - 9/1/2005 6:00:47 AM