Let me try and understand your view point.
What part of my speculation do you consider as pseudoscience?
It can't be the Bernoulli's equations that state: p + qv2/2 + qgy = constant
where p is the pressure, q is the density, v the velocity and y the height in a gravitational field of strength g, all measured at the same point. This quantity is then constant throughout the fluid.
More information on the Bernoulli effect can be found on this web site: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pber.html .
I consider Bernoulli's equations as part of the laws of nature.
Perhaps you do not accept the notion that the photons in space have a velocity and can create a pressure on any mass that resides in space. (Does "C" = the speed of light? How could "sails" work in space?)
Perhaps you do not accept the notion that a faster moving fluid has a lower pressure than a slower moving fluid.
Perhaps you do not consider that a low pressure can have the effect of suction.
Perhaps you do not accept the notion of comparing space and mass to a fluid. ( In the Bible the space and mass combination is compared to "water" (at least in my opinion.))
Did you insert the suggested information into the Bernoulli equations and see what the result is?
Could you define the precise point that made you decide that my post is pseudoscience?
Intelligence:
Reason is man's faculty for grasping the world by thought, in contradiction to intelligence, which is man's ability to manipulate the world with the help of thought. Reason is man's instrument for arriving at the truth, intelligence is man's instrument for manipulating the world more successfully; the former is essentially human, the latter belongs to the animal part of man.
Erich Fromm (1900–1980), U.S. psychologist. The Sane Society, ch. 3, "The Need for a Frame of Orientation and Devotion— Reason vs. Irrationality" (1955).
Johannes
