re: ""C" = constant = 0 = reference point"

DL — 9/2/2005 10:51:20 PM (archived)

How do you say this stuff without your head exploding, Johannes? This is mind-mumbingly wrong, and I don't wven have a 50th of the Physics background the people you are trying to argue with have.

At some point, don't you ever get honest with yourself?

DL

The whole thread (37 posts)

Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory - SDF - 8/31/2005 7:43:46 PM
- And still they get it wrong: God doesn't push down... - Robert - 8/31/2005 10:01:44 PM
  - re: the Earth sucks, So It Is Written On The Bathroom Wall. - Johannes - 9/1/2005 5:10:26 AM
    - Don't use the terms when you don't have a clue as to what they mean - R.L. - 9/1/2005 6:28:33 AM
      - re: when you don't have a clue as to what they mean? - Johannes - 9/1/2005 10:35:28 PM
        
        One example - ModBob - 9/2/2005 8:43:39 AM
        
        re: Interesting - Johannes - 9/2/2005 10:37:13 PM
        
        re: ""C" = constant = 0 = reference point" - DL - 9/2/2005 10:51:20 PM
        
        re: Hmmm.............. - Johannes - 9/3/2005 3:22:32 AM
        
        Ok.... - R.L. - 9/4/2005 5:30:12 AM
        
        re: Ok.... - Johannes - 9/6/2005 4:43:31 AM
        
        "explaining" the speed of light to a laser tech. Funny stuff! Keep it coming! (n/t) - alcaray - 9/7/2005 11:57:42 PM
        
        I am used to it.... - R.L. - 9/8/2005 4:18:25 AM
        
        Just spotted this... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/9/2005 8:44:30 AM
        
        re: Another congregation member? - Johannes - 9/8/2005 1:24:33 AM
        
        Man, I would hate to be your auto mechanic. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/8/2005 3:32:14 PM
        
        No, he can just spot BS... (n/t) - R.L. - 9/8/2005 4:19:57 AM
        
        Johannes, I have long since given up trying to correct you - DL - 9/3/2005 4:50:28 PM
        
        Late to the party - Mary Anne (moderator) - 9/6/2005 5:25:16 PM
        
        I think I'll just forgo posting in response to him - DL - 9/7/2005 12:13:59 AM
        
        Why? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2005 1:48:14 AM
        
        Indeed, you are right MA, and I am just ill tempered as of late - DL - 9/7/2005 3:38:19 AM
        
        re: And I thought you were the smarter one in the family. - Johannes - 9/4/2005 3:00:47 AM
        
        You thought wrong - DL - 9/5/2005 5:46:24 PM
        
        re: Look DL and RL - Johannes - 9/6/2005 6:01:46 AM
        
        re: Look DL and RL - DL - 9/6/2005 1:16:03 PM
        
        re: Despite what he says, your brother IS the smarter one in your family. (n/t) - Johannes - 9/7/2005 4:25:11 AM
        
        Its so cute to see you trying to spar with me. - DL - 9/7/2005 3:16:33 PM
        
        re: My mistake, I admit I'm not perfect, I was under the impression that the post was from RL :-] (n/t) - Johannes - 9/7/2005 6:06:46 PM
        
        I think you have an interesting hypothesis, but let's approach it from a different angle shall we - SDF - 9/4/2005 1:28:28 PM
        
        re: Thank you SDF, your intelligent answers and questions are much appreciated. - Johannes - 9/5/2005 11:57:20 PM
        
        It raises questions I think, about a quantum theory of gravity, but not religion - SDF - 9/4/2005 1:55:35 PM
        
        It raises NOTHING - R.L. - 9/5/2005 1:56:50 AM
        
        The original post is nonsense. But optical physics is not nonsense. (n/t) - SDF - 9/5/2005 5:05:27 AM
        
        Oh? - R.L. - 9/8/2005 1:09:09 AM
        
        Well, maybe R.L.'s ire... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2005 5:03:32 AM
    - ***Thread moved*** - ModBob - 9/1/2005 6:00:47 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (37 posts)