It contains no gratuitous insults.
In fact, Lindy's reply is noticably "flamier", but I'm not going to do anything about it, either.
I weary of the whining, Madonna. You show a marked lack of respect for the process of moderation when you pointedly, repeatedly, question Frank's judgement as a basis for allegations of maltreatment of liberal posters -- or preferential treatment of conservative posters -- while ignoring my presence altogether.
If you don't like what Tech said, answer it. If you have a legitmate complaint about the moderation of CE, or any other board, there is a place to air it: the Community Board. If you don't want to make it public, there's an email link to Robert.
As for the "ideologue" remark -- why else do we come to Current Events, if we are not all ideologues about one thing or another?
Current Events » in reply to The above isn't a Flame because - - -
The above isn't a Flame because:
The whole thread (17 posts)
- It's getting convoluted in Iraq
