Space/Science » in reply to re: Magnificent Desolation

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Magnificent Desolation - Raoul - 10/7/2005 8:01:56 AM
  • re: Magnificent Desolation - ken murphy - 10/8/2005 4:19:05 AM
    • re: Magnificent Desolation - et - 10/10/2005 12:54:49 AM
      • re: Magnificent Desolation - ken murphy - 10/11/2005 3:57:48 AM
        • Small world! (n/t) - et - 10/11/2005 5:39:34 PM
  • re: Magnificent Desolation - et - 10/7/2005 2:52:20 PM
    • re: Magnificent Desolation - Raoul - 10/7/2005 5:36:13 PM
      • re: Magnificent Desolation lack of attendence - Delbert - 10/8/2005 6:52:29 PM
        • re: Magnificent Desolation lack of attendence - LJK - 10/10/2005 3:41:46 PM
        • re: Magnificent Desolation lack of attendence - Chris Vancil - 10/8/2005 7:35:37 PM
          • re: Magnificent Desolation lack of attendence - ken murphy - 10/8/2005 11:46:49 PM
            • re: Magnificent Desolation lack of attendence - Chris Vancil - 10/9/2005 1:04:26 AM
              • re: Correction: MD lack of attendence - Chris Vancil - 10/11/2005 9:06:03 PM
              • Does MD inadvertently give Apollo Hoax proponents some ammunition? - LJK - 10/10/2005 4:38:23 PM
                • re: Nope! They have the photos, the rocks and all the documentation and hardware of Apollo and don't believe it happened... - Chris Vancil - 10/11/2005 8:38:10 PM
              • Does MD inadvertently give Apollo Hoax proponents some ammunition? - LJK - 10/10/2005 4:38:21 PM