So which Universe Creation model do you like?
None. An open mind, a sense of wonder, and rigorous exploration of solid data. I don't know how the universe 'began', and I recognize that the word 'began' in an analysis entails certain subjective assumptions about time which may or may not be meaningful after a certain horizon.
"To me the big absurdity of the Steady State model is that matter is creating itself anew all the time, but no one ever explained how, where, or why. That's practically supernatural as far as I am concerned."
Well, I'm not really going to argue pro or con here. I don't think that many of the key notions of what you call the 'steady state model' are actively in play anymore in cosmology- though some may have been modified and re-applied. So-Called 'paradigm shifts' often are not.
DL
Space/Science » in reply to re: yes, it is just you ;-)
re: So which Universe Creation model do you like?
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Light shone upon "dark matter"?
- Ockam's Razor wins again!
- re: Light shone upon "dark matter"?
- Still dark energy, though.
