Sometimes things go far beyond casualties. How can you measure what cost in human life was worth the abolition of slavery?
What about WWI? How long did that last? How many lives? Did it solve anything?
Then what about WWII?
With what's happened to Europe anyway, was it really worth all the trouble?
How is the magic number determined as to what people's freedom is worth fighting for?
Don't fall into the trap of playing their "numbers" game. Let them explain why they think Iraqis are worthless human scum who deserved no better fate than mass graves or wood chippers?
It's the leftists that complain about US casualties in Iraq that are morally reprehensible.
They use US deaths and Iraqis deaths only to serve their own anti-Bush political agenda.
It's obscene.
It's repugnant.
It's par for the course.
Current Events » in reply to That number is probably close to correct.
Was the Civil War worth it?
The whole thread (31 posts)
- On Iraqi civilian deaths.
- To put it into perspective,...
- That number is probably close to correct.
- re: That number is probably close to correct.
- Was the Civil War worth it?
- We didn't invade ourselves.
- And you shed tears for plantation owners too I betcha. (n/t)
- As a Canadian, I have a problem with your perspectives
- "They use US deaths and Iraqis deaths only to serve their own anti-Bush political agenda."
- Interesting question.
- We didn't invade ourselves.