Tom, was the outing revenge, or not?

Current Events » in reply to And how much of that do you suppose is actually true?

Tom, was the outing revenge, or not?

R.L. — 10/30/2005 3:37:34 AM (archived)

It was at the very least an abuse of power.... hurting a guy that didnt play the party line- he turned out to be right and was punished for speaking his correct view...

It seems pretty clear that laws were broken in exacting this revenge- why the hell do you find this defensible?

The whole thread (31 posts)

Joe Wilson: Our 27 months of hell - Donald - 10/30/2005 12:23:57 AM
- Wilson should run for President. The Leftists think he can turn water into wine. - Scott Evil - 10/31/2005 2:40:15 PM
- Did somebody repossess the Jaguar and the Hermes scarf? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 6:54:35 AM
- And how much of that do you suppose is actually true? - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 1:54:57 AM
  - Crimes against people that conservatives don't like, aren't crimes at all. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/31/2005 6:04:39 PM
  - The Office of Special Plans scandal is beginning to break - E.P., the heretic - 10/30/2005 5:53:02 PM
  - Tom, was the outing revenge, or not? - R.L. - 10/30/2005 3:37:34 AM
    - When he went public with his story... - Larry J - 10/31/2005 3:31:22 PM
  - All of it - Donald - 10/30/2005 2:29:16 AM
    - I notice you ducked the discrepancies I mentioned. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 3:26:38 AM
      - The Emperor's New Clothes, Republican version - Robert - 10/31/2005 7:31:25 PM
        
        re: The Emperor's New Clothes - Tom Brosz - 10/31/2005 8:19:49 PM
        
        Slipsliding - Robert - 10/31/2005 10:57:54 PM
        
        It's all going to fall apart for you Republicans over the next four years. - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/1/2005 12:01:19 AM
        
        So, winkie me this: - alcaray - 11/1/2005 7:29:20 PM
        
        ;-) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/1/2005 11:59:15 PM
        
        So when I see a winkie, you mean the opposite of what you state? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/2/2005 3:46:01 PM
      - No I didn't - Donald - 10/30/2005 3:47:51 AM
        
        Her classification went up in smoke. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 7:44:34 AM
        
        ***RL's reply removed, with a language warning *** - Fox, as Moderator - 10/30/2005 5:57:08 PM
        
        Would "B.S." be ok? (n/t) - R.L. - 10/30/2005 6:05:45 PM
        
        I'll accept that (n/t) - Fox - 10/31/2005 12:28:20 AM
        
        Did I miss anything really good? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/31/2005 3:01:14 AM
        
        It was R.L. lite... - R.L. - 11/1/2005 8:32:30 AM
        
        Feel free to correct the factual errors in the post. - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/2/2005 12:12:02 AM
        
        Because someone broke the law and disclosed it - Donald - 10/30/2005 1:33:29 PM
        
        Like most things, it depends where you sit. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 10:42:25 PM
        
        If it's such an obvious crime, where are the indictments for it? - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 4:39:52 AM
        
        The grand jury has a limited term. - Mary Anne - 10/30/2005 3:26:01 PM
        
        Nice try. - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 8:18:44 PM
        
        If its not a crime, why was the investigation extended? - Donald - 10/30/2005 1:25:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)