Because someone broke the law and disclosed it

Current Events » in reply to Her classification went up in smoke.

Because someone broke the law and disclosed it

Donald — 10/30/2005 1:33:29 PM (archived)

That's what the prosecutor continues to investigate. The prospect that highly placed officials in the White House may have broken the law and deliberately leaked classified information as retaliation for someone telling the truth should be disturbing to you.

The whole thread (31 posts)

Joe Wilson: Our 27 months of hell - Donald - 10/30/2005 12:23:57 AM
- Wilson should run for President. The Leftists think he can turn water into wine. - Scott Evil - 10/31/2005 2:40:15 PM
- Did somebody repossess the Jaguar and the Hermes scarf? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 6:54:35 AM
- And how much of that do you suppose is actually true? - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 1:54:57 AM
  - Crimes against people that conservatives don't like, aren't crimes at all. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/31/2005 6:04:39 PM
  - The Office of Special Plans scandal is beginning to break - E.P., the heretic - 10/30/2005 5:53:02 PM
  - Tom, was the outing revenge, or not? - R.L. - 10/30/2005 3:37:34 AM
    - When he went public with his story... - Larry J - 10/31/2005 3:31:22 PM
  - All of it - Donald - 10/30/2005 2:29:16 AM
    - I notice you ducked the discrepancies I mentioned. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 3:26:38 AM
      - The Emperor's New Clothes, Republican version - Robert - 10/31/2005 7:31:25 PM
        
        re: The Emperor's New Clothes - Tom Brosz - 10/31/2005 8:19:49 PM
        
        Slipsliding - Robert - 10/31/2005 10:57:54 PM
        
        It's all going to fall apart for you Republicans over the next four years. - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/1/2005 12:01:19 AM
        
        So, winkie me this: - alcaray - 11/1/2005 7:29:20 PM
        
        ;-) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/1/2005 11:59:15 PM
        
        So when I see a winkie, you mean the opposite of what you state? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/2/2005 3:46:01 PM
      - No I didn't - Donald - 10/30/2005 3:47:51 AM
        
        Her classification went up in smoke. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 7:44:34 AM
        
        ***RL's reply removed, with a language warning *** - Fox, as Moderator - 10/30/2005 5:57:08 PM
        
        Would "B.S." be ok? (n/t) - R.L. - 10/30/2005 6:05:45 PM
        
        I'll accept that (n/t) - Fox - 10/31/2005 12:28:20 AM
        
        Did I miss anything really good? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/31/2005 3:01:14 AM
        
        It was R.L. lite... - R.L. - 11/1/2005 8:32:30 AM
        
        Feel free to correct the factual errors in the post. - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/2/2005 12:12:02 AM
        
        Because someone broke the law and disclosed it - Donald - 10/30/2005 1:33:29 PM
        
        Like most things, it depends where you sit. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/30/2005 10:42:25 PM
        
        If it's such an obvious crime, where are the indictments for it? - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 4:39:52 AM
        
        The grand jury has a limited term. - Mary Anne - 10/30/2005 3:26:01 PM
        
        Nice try. - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2005 8:18:44 PM
        
        If its not a crime, why was the investigation extended? - Donald - 10/30/2005 1:25:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (31 posts)