So is letting information go in one ear and out the other.
That speech was BEFORE the Novak article. Think about it.
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Another blast from the past
- We haven't finished with the last one yet.
- Was there a point? (n/t)
- Apparently not an obvious enough one.
- HIt return too fast.
- Bad sign
- So is letting information go in one ear and out the other.
- What's your point?
- What makes you think so? Is there a source on this that I would believe? (n/t)
- Here is one
- Quite a fall you've set yourself up for there.
- Excuse me??
- So is letting information go in one ear and out the other.
- Bad sign
- HIt return too fast.
- Yes.
- Apparently not an obvious enough one.