I don't know. I didn't start getting harsh until I had to make things so bloody obvious. I'm tired of having to deal with people whose perception of blogging is on the level of someone wondering how they got all those little people inside the TV set.
One of the most important functions of bloggers is that they collect and integrate information from many different sources. Some reliable, some not. I make my own judgments on these.
To go to a site, and decide you don't like the look or tone of the page, and not bother to even check out the sources and links (which in this case included original audio and transcripts, as well as information from the leftist site where the lecture took place), is one's perogative, but I don't want to hear any shit afterwards about "reliable sources" from someone who has no idea what he's talking about.
Flame » in reply to bit harsh for not following one of tom's links
re: bit harsh for not following one of tom's links
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Another blast from the past
- We haven't finished with the last one yet.
- Was there a point? (n/t)
- Apparently not an obvious enough one.
- HIt return too fast.
- Bad sign
- So is letting information go in one ear and out the other.
- What's your point?
- What makes you think so? Is there a source on this that I would believe? (n/t)
- Here is one
- Quite a fall you've set yourself up for there.
- Excuse me??
- So is letting information go in one ear and out the other.
- Bad sign
- HIt return too fast.
- Yes.
- Apparently not an obvious enough one.