Forget it.

Flame » in reply to With only assertion from one of the foaming-at-the-mouth set...

Forget it.

Tom Brosz — 11/2/2005 5:49:32 PM (archived)

You obviously didn't click on any of the many links to follow up the original sources, and frankly, I've got a cold this morning and no patience for people who look at my finger like a goddam dog when I'm pointing at something else.

The whole thread (42 posts)

Another blast from the past - Tom Brosz - 11/1/2005 5:51:02 PM
- We haven't finished with the last one yet. - Bowser - 11/2/2005 2:17:23 AM
  - That one went clean over your head. - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 3:44:36 PM
    - Nice try. Just keep ignoring, keep using titles which mislead. - Bowser - 11/2/2005 11:14:26 PM
- Was there a point? (n/t) - Tony - 11/1/2005 6:19:40 PM
  - Apparently not an obvious enough one. - Tom - 11/1/2005 7:26:56 PM
    - HIt return too fast. - Tom Brosz - 11/1/2005 7:30:34 PM
      - Bad sign - Tony - 11/1/2005 10:20:13 PM
        
        So is letting information go in one ear and out the other. - Tom Brosz - 11/1/2005 11:34:38 PM
        
        What's your point? - Tony - 11/2/2005 1:55:30 AM
        
        By that name? Her cover identity? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 2:59:47 AM
        
        The same maiden name as in Who's Who? - Tony - 11/2/2005 1:54:50 PM
        
        Her employment wasn't that big a secret either. - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 3:42:45 PM
        
        Karmic Principle....you get what you give - Lindy - 11/5/2005 3:58:56 PM
        
        BTW, on Clinton and principles. - Tom Brosz - 11/5/2005 6:26:12 PM
        
        Ah, the usual back-off - Tom Brosz - 11/5/2005 6:08:48 PM
        
        Lies - Lindy - 11/6/2005 5:42:06 AM
        
        P.S> - Tony - 11/2/2005 5:10:40 PM
        
        That's a very good question. - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 5:46:33 PM
        
        Universal health care. Next? - Tony - 11/2/2005 5:03:18 PM
        
        What makes you think so? Is there a source on this that I would believe? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/1/2005 11:47:55 PM
        
        Here is one - Tony - 11/2/2005 5:57:13 PM
        
        Quite a fall you've set yourself up for there. - Sam F. - 11/2/2005 5:30:12 AM
        
        Yeh. Only a stupid liberal would think to doubt an internet source. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/2/2005 5:42:33 PM
        
        How's the view? - Sam F. - 11/2/2005 6:06:16 PM
        
        bit harsh for not following one of tom's links - tony - 11/2/2005 7:08:22 PM
        
        It's like reviewing a film you haven't seen - Sam F. - 11/3/2005 5:08:07 AM
        
        Pay attention - Tony - 11/3/2005 2:23:23 PM
        
        Thanks Tony - alcaray - 11/3/2005 4:09:03 PM
        
        Pull the cord.....NOW! (n/t) - Sam F. - 11/3/2005 5:14:34 PM
        
        So far, your major contribution to this thread - Tony - 11/3/2005 6:28:29 PM
        
        Your chute's tangled, Tony! - Sam F. - 11/4/2005 7:23:39 AM
        
        Ya got nothing, and you can't read. Got it. (n/t) - tony - 11/4/2005 3:01:16 PM
        
        re: bit harsh for not following one of tom's links - Tom Brosz - 11/3/2005 4:39:01 AM
        
        I've posted (once or twice?) links to left-wing sites that I thought made an interesting argument. - alcaray - 11/3/2005 4:12:31 PM
        
        Excuse me?? - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 3:01:07 AM
        
        With only assertion from one of the foaming-at-the-mouth set... - alcaray - 11/2/2005 3:52:36 PM
        
        Forget it. - Tom Brosz - 11/2/2005 5:49:32 PM
        
        Not going dumpster-diving on this guy's say-so. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/2/2005 6:34:15 PM
  - Yes. - Scott Evil - 11/1/2005 6:25:09 PM
    - and Tom says it's the left who are delusional - Tony - 11/1/2005 6:37:29 PM
      - She was covert...When she was feeding disinformation to the Clinton Administration - Scott Evil (SENN News) - 11/1/2005 9:26:26 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (42 posts)