Iraq. Bush invaded Iraq. To fight terror. At the urging of neocons. Using the al-Qaida attack on WTC as the pretext.
al-Qaida did not have a demonstrable presence in Iraq. (It did in Saudi Arabia, but Bush protected Saudis.) So much for demonstrating the phoniness of that excuse.
Now, at present, al-Qaida has a strong presence in Iraq. As the result of Bush destabilizing the country. And that was predicted.
Saddam was not exporting terrorism, or WMDs. In fact, didn't have WMDs. The UN wasn't finding them. And neither did Bush.
EVEN THOUGHT Rumsfeld said he had 'em, and he, Rumsfeld, knew where they were.
Nope, you're saying there is a terrorist out there who was active before the invasion.
Well, DUH!! And now there are more. And now there are more operating where they couldn't before Bush invaded.
As was predicted.
Care to deny that?
Current Events » in reply to re: where it wasn't before
Obfuscation.
The whole thread (51 posts)
- Terror For Export (where it wasn't before)
- re: where it wasn't before
- surely you don't think...
- Obfuscation.
- Let's see your numbers. (n/t)
- And if I do, which is ridiculous, will you concede you folks were entirely wrong?
- Not that easy.
- Again - Is Iraq NOW a haven for al-Qaida - since Bush.
- Part of your problem
- Missed that whole "flypaper" thing didn't ya? (n/t)
- Pretty hard to miss
- Missed that whole "winning hearts and minds of Iraqi people" thing didn't ya?
- The fact is this war has been a wonderful thing for terrorist recruiting...
- Where do you buy flypaper?
- BS is BS is BS. Simple questions, simple answers.
- Wasn't that the plan all along?
- He thinks it's proof of Unintelligent Design
- It is. Yes or no. Cut the crap. Or don't - we'll know. (n/t)
- Again - Is Iraq NOW a haven for al-Qaida - since Bush.
- Not that easy.
- And if I do, which is ridiculous, will you concede you folks were entirely wrong?
- Let's see your numbers. (n/t)
- Ah c'mon Bowser.......
- re: where it wasn't before