Space/Science » in reply to re: Yeah, global warming is 'natural'

CO2

Tom Brosz — 11/26/2005 8:12:47 AM (archived)

The data for the current rise in CO2 levels is worldwide, not just from measurements in Antarctica. How much of this is due to human action is still up for argument. This thirty-year time period would be totally lost in the noise of the ice core measurement time frame.

This graph is typical of several I've seen:

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (36 posts)

• Yeah, global warming is 'natural' - R.L. - 11/25/2005 11:17:28 PM
  • 27% percent higher than last year? - JimO - 11/28/2005 7:49:09 PM
    • granularity: probably talking in 1K year increments, or somesuch. - alcaray - 11/28/2005 10:13:32 PM
  • global warming is 'natural' on Mars? - JimO - 11/28/2005 7:45:34 PM
    • Did anyone claim that there was industry on Mars? - alcaray - 11/28/2005 10:17:07 PM
      • Global warming on Mars might be a sign that something other than CO2 is causing it - Larry J - 11/29/2005 10:06:34 PM
        • Could be. Or it could be something to do with... - alcaray - 11/29/2005 10:53:51 PM
  • R.L., do you have any idea why the last ice age ended? - E.P., the heretic - 11/26/2005 2:59:31 PM
    • Better question: WHAT CAUSED IT ? (n/t) - SDF - 11/27/2005 2:34:20 PM
      • Don't you think an ice age would be far more devastating than a warming trend? - SDF - 11/27/2005 2:39:51 PM
        • Answer: What causes ice ages (might also cause global warming) - SDF - 11/27/2005 2:57:49 PM
          • Very good post. - Scott Evil (SEN News) - 11/28/2005 10:40:12 PM
  • re: Yeah, global warming is 'natural' - gbaikie - 11/26/2005 2:20:55 AM
    • You know, if you were to take an hour to educate yourself... - R.L. - 11/26/2005 1:19:01 PM
      • re: You know, if you were to take an hour to educate yourself... - JimO - 11/28/2005 7:54:11 PM
      • re: You know, if you were to take an hour to educate yourself... - gbaikie - 11/27/2005 5:06:38 AM
      • "we KNOW that we can expect things to get worse" - Sam F. - 11/26/2005 6:58:46 PM
    • CO2 - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 8:12:47 AM
      • It is possible that NOAA monitoring stations are contaminated by local activity - SDF - 11/26/2005 3:26:13 PM
        • Don't think so. - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 10:10:18 PM
          • Wikipedia has a good webpage about the controversy - Sam F. - 11/27/2005 8:43:20 AM
            • I dunno - SDF - 11/27/2005 2:31:53 PM
              • Apocalyptic weather - Sam F. - 11/28/2005 4:39:44 AM
      • Worn out, tired, and never was valid. - Bowser - 11/26/2005 8:47:16 AM
        • Your the one with the Black & White thinking... - Scott Evil (SEN News) - 11/28/2005 10:50:09 PM
  • I'd like to see the graphs - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 1:27:57 AM
    • Thanks much for the graph - E.P., the heretic - 11/26/2005 3:07:39 PM
    • More data is up on Science home page - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 1:32:07 AM
      • WHAT THE HECK?! - R.L. - 11/28/2005 12:32:42 AM
        • re: WHAT THE HECK?! - Tom Brosz - 11/28/2005 1:49:25 AM
          • I figured it out- wasted 20 bucks to finally get the CO2 paper... - R.L. - 11/28/2005 2:18:52 AM
      • I will pay for it once I am off the mountain... (n/t) - R.L. - 11/26/2005 4:52:31 AM
        • re: I will pay for it once I am off the mountain... - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 7:48:57 AM
      • Ten bucks an article. I'm there. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/26/2005 1:59:29 AM
  • Global cooling is too - E.P., the heretic - 11/26/2005 1:00:53 AM
  • Ya but you have to look at the big picture. - Bowser - 11/26/2005 12:42:17 AM