Some disagreement on your thesis, by someone I would trust more than your winger bloggers.

Current Events » in reply to re: Brewster Jennings

Some disagreement on your thesis, by someone I would trust more than your winger bloggers.

alcaray — 12/17/2005 6:15:49 PM (archived)

Prior to July 14, 2003, Valerie Wilsonâ€™s employment status was classified. Prior to that date, her affiliation with the CIA was not common knowledge outside the intelligence community. Disclosure of classified information about an individualâ€™s employment by the CIA has the potential to damage the national security in ways that range from preventing that individualâ€™s future use in a covert capacity, to compromising intelligence-gathering methods and operations, and endangering the safety of CIA employees and those who deal with them, the indictment states.

Carry on.

The whole thread (27 posts)

Novak: Bush knows who outed Plame - Donald - 12/15/2005 1:36:28 AM
- Novak knows who "outed" Plame, so why doesn't he just say so? - Larry J - 12/15/2005 7:28:03 PM
  - re: Novak knows who "outed" Plame, so why doesn't he just say so? - azstrummer - 12/15/2005 7:43:27 PM
    - re: who "outed" Plame - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2005 8:49:17 PM
      - Brewster Jennings - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 9:36:01 PM
        
        re: Brewster Jennings - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 9:55:38 PM
        
        Some disagreement on your thesis, by someone I would trust more than your winger bloggers. - alcaray - 12/17/2005 6:15:49 PM
        
        So where's the indictment on that count? - Tom Brosz - 12/17/2005 7:53:06 PM
        
        Careful calling yourself "Stupid Brosz". - alcaray - 12/18/2005 9:39:17 AM
        
        So if it wasn't a crime, then why the coverup? - azstrummer - 12/16/2005 10:56:12 PM
        
        What coverup? - Tom Brosz - 12/17/2005 2:26:52 AM
        
        How much cash? (n/t) - Tony - 12/19/2005 4:48:34 AM
    - Look at the charges - Larry J - 12/15/2005 8:27:46 PM
- A Republican Chief Law Enforcement Officer obstructing justice? You must mean Nixon. - Bowser - 12/15/2005 5:33:46 AM
- But NFB cares (n/t) - FrankC - 12/15/2005 4:52:43 AM
  - A couple of pertinent quotes - alcaray - 12/15/2005 6:15:32 PM
    - maybe, maybe not - FrankC - 12/15/2005 6:36:54 PM
      - Perhaps you need... - alcaray - 12/15/2005 6:50:37 PM
  - And you find this 'fact' comforting...? - R.L. - 12/15/2005 9:39:31 AM
    - Not really...It is comforting to know that the anti-war freaks are completely out of touch with the vast majority of Americans. - Scott Evil - 12/15/2005 6:16:58 PM
      - I got yer vast majority right here! - R.L. - 12/16/2005 12:53:44 AM
      - WHAT planet are you on? "Vast majority"? - R.L. - 12/16/2005 12:52:07 AM
        
        That poll was from before the constitution vote. - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 4:43:59 AM
        
        Think you will be in the 'vast majority' in couple weeks? - R.L. - 12/16/2005 6:23:10 AM
        
        re: 'vast majority' - Tom Brosz - 12/16/2005 8:14:24 AM
        
        Ah, now we see the strategy I predicted long ago... - R.L. - 12/16/2005 7:24:11 PM
        
        Revisionism 101 - Lindy - 12/16/2005 4:45:11 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (27 posts)