A new King George?

Chris Vancil — 12/21/2005 4:06:19 PM (archived)

So exactly why do we need a Patriots Act again?

It seem that George W. Bush doesn't feel a need to abide by our laws so why renew Patriots Act that seems redundant. It seems like he can just do as he damn well pleases without worrying about those nasty in the way things called laws.

I wonder exactly what else he had been doing which violated the constitution and our laws?

I love that Texas repub congress critter that recently said we need more "security" over "freedom" and his question was..."What good is freedom if your dead?" What a clueless lot these Texans are if this is an example of their best! I don't think he has grasp the concept of patriot and I suggest you all read this and ponder what value is freedom if you will not protect it with your life...http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/henry-liberty.html One has got to ask...what have our troops been doing spilling their blood for this man and country?

We do not need or want a King George, thank you!

Maybe it's a time to seriously talk of impreachment.

The whole thread (35 posts)

A new King George? - Chris Vancil - 12/21/2005 4:06:19 PM
- Time to talk seriously - McFly - 12/21/2005 6:20:39 PM
  - Like father, like son - Lindy - 12/22/2005 4:59:00 AM
  - should have said... - McFly - 12/21/2005 6:28:47 PM
    - What the law says... - Larry J - 12/22/2005 3:19:58 AM
      - re: Yes well it's a load of BS. He was required to go thru FISA courts and chose not to. - Chris Vancil - 12/22/2005 8:38:16 AM
        
        The law says otherwise - Larry J - 12/22/2005 2:41:07 PM
        
        re: Simple question for you ALL. Why do we have a FISA court? - Chris Vancil - 12/22/2005 10:20:13 PM
        
        Here's a little reading assignment... - Larry J - 12/23/2005 12:07:27 AM
        
        re: No Larry and other question. Who are called the LAW makers here in the old USA? - Chris Vancil - 12/23/2005 12:57:15 AM
        
        So that's the administration's position... - alcaray - 12/23/2005 12:25:35 AM
        
        You can read what a Clinton Administration Assistant Attorney General wrote on the same subject... - Larry J - 12/23/2005 12:55:20 AM
        
        re: Why is it that every time Bush does wrong you folks drag out a "Clinton Administration" hack? You think it makes your BS more tasty? - Chris Vancil - 12/23/2005 8:51:23 AM
        
        Nice try. - Tom Brosz - 12/23/2005 8:26:57 PM
        
        re:Yes on your part! It is simply a tired and stupid plan to cite Clinton era "experts" every time Bush step in it!. - Chris Vancil - 12/23/2005 10:02:30 PM
        
        No, that really is the Bush administration's position. - alcaray - 12/23/2005 6:16:29 AM
        
        It is helpful to differentiate a legal opinion from THE LAW - alcaray - 12/22/2005 4:06:51 PM
        
        re: THE LAW - Tom Brosz - 12/23/2005 5:44:55 AM
        
        Please tell me that you understand that's the administration's position (n/t) - alcaray - 12/23/2005 6:17:27 AM
        
        That's not going to work. - Tom Brosz - 12/23/2005 7:19:12 AM
        
        We'd never have anything to talk about if that held true...:-) (n/t) - Tony - 12/23/2005 4:15:51 PM
        
        But that's my position that you just articulated - alcaray - 12/23/2005 3:51:30 PM
        
        Federal Judge quits in Protest of Bush's New Law - Lindy - 12/22/2005 3:57:35 PM
      - Larry, nobody cares. - Tom Brosz - 12/22/2005 6:19:52 AM
        
        Your next fact on this will be your first... (n/t) - Tony - 12/22/2005 5:27:15 PM
        
        re: Larry, nobody cares. - Scott Evil - 12/22/2005 2:43:50 PM
        
        re: Not for more repub spin! - Chris Vancil - 12/22/2005 8:46:22 AM
        
        So, is citing the law spin? - Larry J - 12/22/2005 2:42:11 PM
        
        re: When you start citing applicable law I will listen...never the less we need to seriously start an investigation into ALL of Bush's amoral behavior not just this BS. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/22/2005 9:59:56 PM
        
        Who's pulling what from where now? - tony - 12/22/2005 3:34:17 PM
        
        As everyone keeps telling me, what the hell do bloggers know? - Tom Brosz - 12/23/2005 5:23:30 AM
    - Well, my understanding is that a large number of leakers have stepped forward - alcaray - 12/21/2005 10:56:54 PM
    - re: should have said...Down with King George! - Chris Vancil - 12/21/2005 8:30:48 PM
      - "The bending and contorting of the Constitution to justify a grasping, irresponsible Administration under the banner of â€œnational securityâ€ are an outrage" - US Senator Robert C. Byrd - 12/22/2005 5:32:29 AM
    - Mark Twain: "History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes" - Fox - 12/21/2005 6:47:59 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (35 posts)