Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to The law says otherwise

Federal Judge quits in Protest of Bush's New Law

>" A federal judge has resigned from the court that oversees government surveillance in intelligence cases in protest of President Bush's secret authorization of a domestic spying program. U.S. District Judge James Robertson, one of 11 members of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, sent a letter to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. late Monday notifying him of his resignation.

Two associates familiar with his decision said yesterday that Robertson privately expressed deep concern that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by the president in 2001 was legally questionable and may have tainted the FISA court's work.

At the White House, spokesman Scott McClellan was asked to explain why Bush last year said, "Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires - a wiretap requires a court order. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so." McClellan said.

Revelation of the program last week spurred considerable debate among federal judges, including some who serve on the secret FISA court. For more than a quarter-century, that court had been seen as the only body that could legally authorize secret surveillance of espionage and terrorism suspects, and only when the Justice Department could show probable cause that its targets were foreign governments or their agents.

This time Bush briefed Congress with a sworn-to-secrecy bunch of lawmakers who told Congress they could NOT OBTAIN OUTSIDE LEGAL HELP.
That, to me, sounds like he's "above the <law".>

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (35 posts)