re: No Tom.

Current Events » in reply to ANWR filibustered again.

re: No Tom.

Chris Vancil — 12/23/2005 10:11:52 PM (archived)

They argue it would take ten years, would go to China, would be about 2 to 3% of our output at best (more like 1%) and only benefit the oil companies. While messing up ANWR.

I'm for USA being energy independant are you?

If so ANWR is NOT an answer not by trillions of barrels.

The whole thread (15 posts)

ANWR filibustered again. - Tom Brosz - 12/22/2005 6:23:25 AM
- There is no point to doing ANYTHING that will not get immediate results. - David F Mayer - 12/25/2005 7:27:58 PM
- FYI, a discussion or debate on a subject is NOT a filibuster - Publius - 12/24/2005 8:01:15 PM
- re: No Tom. - Chris Vancil - 12/23/2005 10:11:52 PM
  - How will the US ever become energy independent... - Larry J - 12/26/2005 9:32:31 AM
  - No Chris - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2005 8:38:24 PM
    - re: Sure Tom just avoid my points... - Chris Vancil - 12/24/2005 10:01:04 PM
      - re: points... - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2005 7:50:40 AM
        
        The Congress Repubs should beg for a filibuster on this issue. - Lee - 12/25/2005 8:59:00 AM
        
        re: Sending oil to China is now USA "domestic oil"...interesting misconceptions you have! (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/26/2005 2:18:13 AM
        
        And where does China come into this at? - Lee - 12/26/2005 3:46:02 AM
        
        Liberal mythology - Tom Brosz - 12/26/2005 4:20:25 AM
        
        re: Sure is some fictions there Tom. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/26/2005 8:48:41 PM
- No, they threatened a filibuster. - Lee - 12/22/2005 10:34:36 AM
  - Cowards in Congress - Scott Evil - 12/22/2005 10:41:10 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)