Not a soul. Maybe Bush.

Current Events » in reply to Who would best be served by a civil war in Iraq?

Bowser — 3/4/2006 2:53:04 AM (archived)

He could "defend" the oil fields, with American troops dying to protect Halliburton. (Lotsa medals.)

That's the only benefit I can see from it.

And, this was all predicted.

Arf

The whole thread (14 posts)

More confirmation of Iraqi civil war. - Bowser - 3/4/2006 12:53:17 AM
- Educating the Left - Class in Session. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/4/2006 4:18:34 AM
  - They will never listen to the facts because their minds are made up. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 3/7/2006 2:48:18 PM
  - re: Educating the Left - Class in Session. - REB - 3/4/2006 3:18:53 PM
  - Oh spare me - azstrummer - 3/4/2006 6:57:26 AM
    - No problem. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/4/2006 7:41:16 AM
      - Replace this ...... - Lindy - 3/8/2006 4:51:03 AM
      - re: No problem. - REB - 3/7/2006 3:00:07 PM
        
        Not too surprising. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/7/2006 7:00:33 PM
      - Now hold on... - Tom Brosz - 3/4/2006 8:23:36 AM
        
        Sure, the left may post about these things. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/4/2006 8:46:45 AM
- Who would best be served by a civil war in Iraq? - SteveS - 3/4/2006 2:50:18 AM
  - Not a soul. Maybe Bush. - Bowser - 3/4/2006 2:53:04 AM
    - How about Zarqawi? - SteveS - 3/4/2006 3:57:27 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (14 posts)