I live in Canada, where the freedom of religion is also listed at the top of the charter of rights and freedoms. But religion is not immutable. That is why there is freedom of belief, because there are so many different variants. Which one is correct? Since there is no way to determine which is correct, it would be best IMO to assume they are all wrong, untruthful, and mutable. So while I accept that people may hold a variety of erroneous beliefs, not just in religion but even science, I think people who strongly believe that their particular religion is correct should be refused entry. It doesn't benefit this country to allow entry to those who are not open to questioning their own beliefs, and especially those who wish to impose them on others under the threat of death.
Current Events » in reply to May I ask where you live?
Obviously we disagree
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Iran elected deputy for Asian nations of UN Commission on Disarmament
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- "every Muslim cleric"
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- May I ask where you live?
- Obviously we disagree
- Please note - not all Canadians feel this way! (n/t)
- And how do you test for that?
- Obviously we disagree
- May I ask where you live?
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- The problem is...the UN is rewarding them (n/t)
- "every Muslim cleric"
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
