Conspicuous religious attire would be a good indicator, especially if she refused to remove her burka in a private office. And further questions about religious affiliation. They could be rated on a scale of 1 to 100, where the lower the score the more atheistic, middle score being agnostic, and a high score being devout. The score could consist of 20 true-or-false questions about religious belief, each contributing 5 points to their score if answered true.
Possible questions:
Were your parents religious?
Did you attend a religious school as a child?
Do you attend religious gatherings regularly?
Are you strictly of one particular sect?
Do you support martyrs?
Do you want the laws changed to more favor your religious beliefs?
Do you think religious beliefs are more important than other opinions?
Do you think blasphemers should be executed?
Do you think adulterers should be stoned to executed?
Do you think people of other religions should be executed?
.... et cetera
Current Events » in reply to Immigration regulation by dress code! Ha!
I still think it's a good idea to screen on the basis of conspicuous religious attire.
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Iran elected deputy for Asian nations of UN Commission on Disarmament
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- "every Muslim cleric"
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- May I ask where you live?
- Obviously we disagree
- Please note - not all Canadians feel this way! (n/t)
- And how do you test for that?
- Obviously we disagree
- May I ask where you live?
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- The problem is...the UN is rewarding them (n/t)
- "every Muslim cleric"
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
