That was very creative. And right now I'm so amused by it, I can't clear my mind enough to come up with a response! You may have just invented a brand new, never-seen-before, and utterly meaningless, oxymoron! Congratulations. Unfortunately meaningless conjoining of terms does not further your cause.
But I think what you were trying to do was cast me in the role of preacher standing in front of a bunch of religious zealots, except that instead of whipping them into a delusional frenzy, I would be trying to make them doubt their beliefs. That wasn't it. I was proposing a screening system for immigration that would weed out the zealots before they set foot in this country. The questionaire would not be designed to change anyone's beliefs, simply to act as a filter only allowing through those who are intelligent enough to question their beliefs all by themselves, without anyone's help.
Current Events » in reply to So you're saying that it's OK to be an evangelical agnostic?
I've never seen those two words put together -- How artistic!
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Iran elected deputy for Asian nations of UN Commission on Disarmament
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- "every Muslim cleric"
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- May I ask where you live?
- Obviously we disagree
- Please note - not all Canadians feel this way! (n/t)
- And how do you test for that?
- Obviously we disagree
- May I ask where you live?
- re: Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- Yeah, screw the First Amendment.
- re: "every Muslim cleric"
- The problem is...the UN is rewarding them (n/t)
- "every Muslim cleric"
- You mean "more peaceful islamic rhetoric", don't you?
- More of the peaceful Iran rhetoric
