Good points.

Space/Science » in reply to re: Cool!

Good points.

Tom Brosz — 5/30/2006 1:20:52 AM (archived)

The "tree" concept in evolution has always been an oversimplification of the marvelous chaotic interactions of nature.

The whole thread (41 posts)

Back to the Moon, Moonrush way - Raoul - 5/26/2006 10:31:58 PM
- yes agreed - Daniel - 5/28/2006 6:39:01 AM
- Frontiers and settlement - Robert - 5/28/2006 1:42:24 AM
  - re: Frontiers and settlement - gbaikie - 5/28/2006 3:27:56 AM
    - He3 - Robert - 5/29/2006 6:48:14 PM
      - re: He3 - gbaikie - 5/29/2006 11:24:16 PM
      - re:About He3 - Raoul - 5/29/2006 8:02:25 PM
        
        re: He3 is kind of a red herring - Tom Brosz - 5/30/2006 1:04:52 AM
        
        Point taken - Adam - 5/30/2006 7:10:43 AM
        
        re: Why only fusion? - Ken Murphy - 5/30/2006 1:55:09 AM
  - A romantic myth, not great history - dtb - 5/28/2006 2:59:08 AM
    - Good point. - Tom Brosz - 5/28/2006 10:27:13 PM
    - re: A Gold Rush Made Seattle - Chris Vancil - 5/28/2006 4:36:59 AM
    - Yes? - Robert - 5/28/2006 3:20:11 AM
      - How about a romantic non-myth? - Fox - 5/29/2006 2:01:44 AM
        
        Cool! - Tom Brosz - 5/29/2006 6:38:39 AM
        
        re: Cool! - Robert - 5/29/2006 5:19:33 PM
        
        Good points. - Tom Brosz - 5/30/2006 1:20:52 AM
        
        Well, it says "unknown" but... - nick hoffman - 5/29/2006 11:48:49 AM
        
        I did a little research... - Tom Brosz - 5/29/2006 5:17:13 PM
        
        Thanks for the research, Tom - nick hoffman - 5/30/2006 3:10:43 AM
        
        Might be more sailing than walking - Tom Brosz - 5/30/2006 6:00:11 AM
        
        "Now THAT'S 'walking'" - Robert - 5/29/2006 5:40:12 PM
        
        Helcaraxë - Fox - 5/29/2006 2:17:52 PM
        
        whirlpools versus trees - Robert - 5/29/2006 4:40:18 AM
        
        You're missing the bottleneck - Lee - 5/29/2006 6:35:33 PM
        
        Hey Lee - Robert - 5/29/2006 7:16:57 PM
        
        Two ways of looking at it I guess. - Lee - 5/30/2006 1:32:51 AM
        
        To put it a bit more simply than Robert - Tom Brosz - 5/31/2006 12:32:14 AM
        
        Big difference - Lee - 5/31/2006 7:51:43 AM
        
        No! - Robert - 5/30/2006 4:34:30 PM
        
        The primates who walked and walked and walked... - Robert - 5/29/2006 4:25:17 AM
        
        re: The machines who walked and walked and walked... - Raoul - 5/29/2006 5:48:54 AM
        
        descendants - Robert - 5/29/2006 4:25:31 PM
      - re: Exploring and settling as goals...and comparisons - Raoul - 5/28/2006 8:46:07 AM
        
        re: Exploring and settling as goals...and comparisons - Robert - 5/28/2006 4:53:31 PM
        
        re: Landscapes - Raoul - 5/28/2006 5:52:25 PM
- There are intangibles that are important in human space exploration - Tom Brosz - 5/27/2006 9:39:14 PM
- re: Back to the Moon, Moonrush way - gbaikie - 5/27/2006 12:25:38 AM
  - re: re:Human ingenuity - Raoul - 5/27/2006 8:09:07 AM
    - re: re:Human ingenuity - gbaikie - 5/27/2006 8:09:55 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (41 posts)