Flame » in reply to Just in case, that was not SteveS posting!

The whole thread (28 posts)

• Another Urban Myth? - ER - 6/2/2006 2:19:58 PM
  • I've never had a "flashback". Nor have I met anyone who said they did. - alcaray - 7/3/2006 5:14:37 AM
    • woops! I see you already covered this territory. (n/t) - alcaray - 7/3/2006 5:17:43 AM
  • re: Another Urban Myth? - Steve - 7/1/2006 1:51:51 AM
    • If you don't mind my asking... - ER - 7/1/2006 1:16:04 PM
      • Just in case, that was not SteveS posting! - SteveS - 7/1/2006 3:08:13 PM
        • it was probably that other Steve who was banned from posting - Lindy - 7/1/2006 4:11:03 PM
          • Apparently not, judging by IP - R.L. - 7/2/2006 3:03:27 AM
  • re: Another Urban Myth? - Fox - 6/3/2006 4:03:07 AM
    • (insert drug of choice here) madness - ER - 6/3/2006 1:14:34 PM
      • Tobacco ads - Fox - 6/4/2006 1:58:55 AM
        • Dress rehearsal - ER - 6/4/2006 2:17:16 AM
  • Cheech and Chong Department - ER - 6/3/2006 12:20:02 AM
    • actually, I tried that method - alcaray - 7/3/2006 5:16:00 AM
    • THAT was funny (n/t) - Lindy - 6/3/2006 12:38:59 AM
  • re: Urban Myth? No, it is reality - Publius - 6/2/2006 10:26:57 PM
  • re: Another Urban Myth? - azstrummer - 6/2/2006 8:17:19 PM
    • re: Another Urban Myth? - ER - 6/2/2006 8:39:22 PM
      • re: Another Urban Myth? - azstrummer - 6/2/2006 9:23:34 PM
  • Suspicious - FrankC - 6/2/2006 6:25:06 PM
  • re: Another Urban Myth? - Tom Brosz - 6/2/2006 5:06:22 PM
    • Devil's advocate. - ER - 6/2/2006 6:05:34 PM
      • Profound psychological experience? - Lindy - 6/2/2006 6:55:16 PM
        • re: Profound psychological experience? - azstrummer - 6/2/2006 8:09:48 PM
          • LOL - Lindy - 6/2/2006 8:21:23 PM
        • re: Profound psychological experience? - ER - 6/2/2006 7:28:03 PM
          • re: Profound psychological experience? - Lindy - 6/2/2006 8:22:56 PM
    • Flashbacks - Lindy - 6/2/2006 5:46:25 PM