Correction!

Flame » in reply to The devil in the deconstructed details

Correction!

ER — 9/4/2006 2:10:55 PM (archived)

I saw the campaign commercial again today, paid closer attention this time, and learned that the gentlemen did NOT say "bisexual predator", but "sexual predator". I apologize for the bad reporting and the unwarranted inferences.

The whole thread (36 posts)

The devil in the deconstructed details - ER - 9/2/2006 1:35:38 PM
- The bi-sexual predators are twice as bad (little joke) (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2006 6:02:07 PM
- Correction! - ER - 9/4/2006 2:10:55 PM
  - It probably said "by A sexual predator..." and you missed the "A" But don't feel too bad - Buck Galaxy - 9/6/2006 6:29:00 AM
  - The topic that might have been. - Scott Evil - 9/5/2006 7:30:51 PM
    - "Really Interesting discussion fodder" - Robert - 9/5/2006 8:43:11 PM
      - re: No the discussion wasn't about the sexual predator. - Scott Evil - 9/6/2006 1:17:04 PM
        
        You talking to ME?. (n/t) - ER - 9/6/2006 5:07:56 PM
  - Wondered how long that would take. - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2006 7:58:36 PM
    - No good deed goes unpunished. (n/t) - ER - 9/4/2006 9:33:47 PM
      - Clarification... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 2:16:13 AM
        
        No offense taken. - ER - 9/5/2006 10:56:36 AM
        
        Actually... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 6:22:56 PM
        
        Preconceptions? Moi? (n/t) - ER - 9/5/2006 7:13:43 PM
        
        Was that French? (n/t) - Gomez - 9/6/2006 1:57:20 AM
        
        Oui. (n/t) - ER - 9/6/2006 11:02:27 AM
        
        However, as a demonstration of how these things get started... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 2:18:02 AM
        
        Yes, and... - alcaray - 9/5/2006 6:05:09 PM
        
        LOL (n/t) - buck Galaxy - 9/6/2006 6:23:15 AM
        
        re: LOL - PLO9,OP-[[;;[ - 10/4/2006 4:07:41 AM
- re: The devil in the deconstructed details - Robert - 9/2/2006 3:47:42 PM
  - On a Bisexual Built for Two................. - Publius - 9/2/2006 8:04:19 PM
    - Speaking of Big Sugar... - ER - 9/2/2006 9:12:04 PM
      - Big Sugar... - Publius - 9/3/2006 12:28:50 AM
  - you forgot the other type of 'bisexual' - shmuckface - 9/2/2006 5:22:40 PM
    - That sounds more like something that happens to you, not something you are. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 5:46:35 PM
      - not always - shmuckface - 9/2/2006 5:54:09 PM
        
        I'm with you on this one ......."s" - Lindy - 9/3/2006 11:24:01 PM
        
        yep (n/t) - s. - 9/4/2006 11:23:33 AM
        
        Sex without love may not work out, but it's never boring. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 5:59:20 PM
        
        Here, here old chap. - azstrummer - 10/4/2006 9:34:48 PM
        
        Speak for yourself - s. - 9/2/2006 6:23:45 PM
        
        I apologize if I have offended, Mr. Shmuckface. - ER - 9/2/2006 6:44:46 PM
        
        no offence taken, no fences to mend - s. - 9/2/2006 7:05:10 PM
        
        I figured anyone calling himself "Shmuckface" was just goofing on me anyway. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 7:08:14 PM
  - Neither Rep Or Dem, bisexual? - ER - 9/2/2006 4:54:11 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (36 posts)