On a Bisexual Built for Two.................

Flame » in reply to re: The devil in the deconstructed details

On a Bisexual Built for Two.................

Publius — 9/2/2006 8:04:19 PM (archived)

Great song. Perhaps will become the theme for that new TV series, Menage a trois?

I want to go on record as being a "lefty" in favor of homosexuality, bi-sexuality, private sexuality, and general sexuality. And, I secretly suspect that Republicans don't have sex; they are the result of cloning (didn't you pick up on the obvious, but unspoken, bonding between Rumsfeld and Dolly?)

ER, this is the silly season for newspapers. The most bizarre ads run, some are attacks, some are straw men ads. An example of the latter is the scurrilous, scummy ad campaign the sugar industry is running attacking Davis' Democratic primary efforts. Their hope is to have Smith defeat him and that Smith will be an easier candidate than their boy Crist. This is a great example of the corporate slime attempting to influence the Democratic primary to foster Republican ambitions.

So, take a ride on the Bisexual built for two and laugh your ass off at the feeding frenzy of the advertising fraternity.

Publius

The whole thread (36 posts)

The devil in the deconstructed details - ER - 9/2/2006 1:35:38 PM
- The bi-sexual predators are twice as bad (little joke) (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2006 6:02:07 PM
- Correction! - ER - 9/4/2006 2:10:55 PM
  - It probably said "by A sexual predator..." and you missed the "A" But don't feel too bad - Buck Galaxy - 9/6/2006 6:29:00 AM
  - The topic that might have been. - Scott Evil - 9/5/2006 7:30:51 PM
    - "Really Interesting discussion fodder" - Robert - 9/5/2006 8:43:11 PM
      - re: No the discussion wasn't about the sexual predator. - Scott Evil - 9/6/2006 1:17:04 PM
        
        You talking to ME?. (n/t) - ER - 9/6/2006 5:07:56 PM
  - Wondered how long that would take. - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2006 7:58:36 PM
    - No good deed goes unpunished. (n/t) - ER - 9/4/2006 9:33:47 PM
      - Clarification... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 2:16:13 AM
        
        No offense taken. - ER - 9/5/2006 10:56:36 AM
        
        Actually... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 6:22:56 PM
        
        Preconceptions? Moi? (n/t) - ER - 9/5/2006 7:13:43 PM
        
        Was that French? (n/t) - Gomez - 9/6/2006 1:57:20 AM
        
        Oui. (n/t) - ER - 9/6/2006 11:02:27 AM
        
        However, as a demonstration of how these things get started... - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 2:18:02 AM
        
        Yes, and... - alcaray - 9/5/2006 6:05:09 PM
        
        LOL (n/t) - buck Galaxy - 9/6/2006 6:23:15 AM
        
        re: LOL - PLO9,OP-[[;;[ - 10/4/2006 4:07:41 AM
- re: The devil in the deconstructed details - Robert - 9/2/2006 3:47:42 PM
  - On a Bisexual Built for Two................. - Publius - 9/2/2006 8:04:19 PM
    - Speaking of Big Sugar... - ER - 9/2/2006 9:12:04 PM
      - Big Sugar... - Publius - 9/3/2006 12:28:50 AM
  - you forgot the other type of 'bisexual' - shmuckface - 9/2/2006 5:22:40 PM
    - That sounds more like something that happens to you, not something you are. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 5:46:35 PM
      - not always - shmuckface - 9/2/2006 5:54:09 PM
        
        I'm with you on this one ......."s" - Lindy - 9/3/2006 11:24:01 PM
        
        yep (n/t) - s. - 9/4/2006 11:23:33 AM
        
        Sex without love may not work out, but it's never boring. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 5:59:20 PM
        
        Here, here old chap. - azstrummer - 10/4/2006 9:34:48 PM
        
        Speak for yourself - s. - 9/2/2006 6:23:45 PM
        
        I apologize if I have offended, Mr. Shmuckface. - ER - 9/2/2006 6:44:46 PM
        
        no offence taken, no fences to mend - s. - 9/2/2006 7:05:10 PM
        
        I figured anyone calling himself "Shmuckface" was just goofing on me anyway. (n/t) - ER - 9/2/2006 7:08:14 PM
  - Neither Rep Or Dem, bisexual? - ER - 9/2/2006 4:54:11 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (36 posts)