Hi Michael,

You'll never be able to calculate the size of a planet based upon its mass. Mass has less to do with size and is more properly a byproduct of the flow of energy. Naturally with words like 'massive' it is easily understood why folks confuse mass with size.

Think of electricity and electromagnetism. The stronger the current, the greater the electromagnetic field that surrounds the current. The same sort of relationship applies to energy and mass.

A tiny planet revolving furiously and having more energy pass through it will have far more mass than a giant planet that is rotating slow as molasses and is not tapping as much energy from the solar field. The mass number will never give you an accurate measure of the size.

There are far too many variables. The planet's atomic composition and elements occupy space diferently and channel/conduct energy differently. Sure it's possible that one could eventully come up with formulas for various types of planets based upon fixed atomic composition percentages, distance from the sun, etcetera, leaning heavily on existing data - but these would be generic and system specific, and hardly of any use.

Yes energy and mass are directly related.

Mass interactions become very complex field equations. Eventually more than just energy and mass are at work. We have frequency relationship of wave forms in the component fields of any structure, polarity bias, amplitude and vectors. Repulsion and attraction are then controlled by complex fields containing wave forms of energy with these vectors, relationships, pulls & pushes etcetera.

Newtonian physics is far more useful for most all simple measurement and only when one must deal with the atomic microcosm and the greater universal macrocosm does one need to address and understand frequency relationship of any given flow of energy to understand those observations that do not conform to Newtonian principles.

Gravity, strong force, weak force & electromagnetic force are all interrelated. Unified Field Thoeries try to link them and the various observations/properties associated with each. I believe that the frequency, polar bias and amplitudes of the various component quantum wave forms will be found to be the basis of the differences of each force.

A great example of this is in sympathetic vibration. You drive down the highway and at a certain speed you feel you car shake violently. This is because the frequency of the tires has matched the sympathetic fundamental frequency of the vehicle frame and suddenly transfer more energy to the frame. Going slower or faster will stop this vibration. This same problem is encountered with airplanes as they travel through the air. Air currents match a fundamental frequency in the craft structure and start shaking the plane apart. Sympathetic vibration - a property of frequency relationship - suddenly changes the way energy is normally dispelled and the natural repulsion of two energy flows becomes an attraction.

A tuning fork also uses this sympathetic vibration principle. Flows of energy are frequency specific and are not just dependent upon a fixed quantity of energy or mass.

Extrapolated to the macrocosm, a planet can siphon more energy from the solar field based upon its atomic constituents frequency relationship to this field. So each planet will absorb energy differently, regardless of size or distance from the sun.

Hope that helps clarify a few things for you. There's a lot to ponder out there and still much to be learned.