Exactly...

Off Topic » in reply to Of course they are...

Exactly...

Michael Gmirkin — 9/30/2006 3:13:51 PM (archived)

;o]

The whole thread (68 posts)

E=M*(C^2) question? - Michael Gmirkin - 9/23/2006 8:30:21 PM
- re: E=M*(C^2) question? - Johannes - 9/27/2006 4:11:05 AM
  - Are you SURE you're not the Techmeister incognito? (n/t) - ER - 9/27/2006 11:30:38 PM
    - re: Was my explanation incomprehensible? (n/t) - Johannes - 10/1/2006 3:26:52 AM
      - Incomprehensible? No, it was impenetrable! (n/t) - ER - 10/1/2006 1:03:32 PM
        
        re: Sorry about that, - Johannes - 10/2/2006 3:37:59 AM
        
        To restate a bit... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/2/2006 11:01:47 PM
        
        re: Like a time bubble? - Johannes - 10/5/2006 3:19:03 AM
        
        re: Like a time bubble? - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 5:02:01 PM
- re: E=M*(C^2) question? - ER - 9/24/2006 1:10:56 AM
  - An example problem - ER - 9/24/2006 3:13:54 PM
    - re: An example problem - Michael Gmirkin - 9/25/2006 4:17:19 AM
      - mass and matter - ER - 9/25/2006 10:27:00 AM
        
        Interesting... I think I get what I was trying to articulate now... ;o] - Michael Gmirkin - 9/28/2006 12:25:40 AM
        
        Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc. - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/28/2006 1:29:28 AM
        
        re: Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc. - Michael Gmirkin - 9/28/2006 5:59:46 AM
        
        Fields, waves, mass, acceleration, etc. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/5/2006 8:59:23 PM
        
        re: Fields, waves, mass, acceleration, etc. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 11:35:39 PM
        
        Minor clarification... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 11:48:18 PM
        
        Thank you. :) - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 10:50:43 PM
        
        Score one for Wikipedia... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/28/2006 6:55:30 AM
        
        re: Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc. - Michael Gmirkin - 9/28/2006 5:46:53 AM
        
        You've lost me. - ER - 9/28/2006 1:26:41 AM
        
        Like car keys, you're always in the last place I look... =o] - Michael Gmirkin - 9/28/2006 8:08:36 AM
        
        Of course they are... - Lee - 9/30/2006 5:27:54 AM
        
        Exactly... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/30/2006 3:13:51 PM
        
        This is not the place... - ER - 9/28/2006 2:27:30 PM
        
        This is as good a place as any. ;o] - Michael Gmirkin - 9/30/2006 11:37:09 PM
        
        re: This is as good a place as any. ;o] - ER - 10/1/2006 2:40:43 PM
        
        Thanks for the comments. :) - Michael Gmirkin - 10/2/2006 8:41:22 PM
        
        re: Good explanations and questions, thank you Michael. - Johannes - 10/1/2006 1:58:33 AM
        
        The answer is, you can't. - ER - 10/1/2006 8:21:08 PM
        
        Ohh, sure you can... You just have to be creative. =o] (I think I get it now, BTW; read on) - Michael Gmirkin - 10/2/2006 5:55:00 PM
        
        Probably going to regret this.... for Johannes, Gmirkin, SDAI etc etc: Math, Science, Reality and Language - DL - 10/5/2006 6:37:03 AM
        
        Well done, but probably a waste of time. (n/t) - ER - 10/7/2006 3:22:30 AM
        
        hehehe - YetiKnight - 10/9/2006 1:01:01 AM
        
        Reality. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/5/2006 9:45:36 PM
        
        re: God in science? - Johannes - 10/6/2006 9:34:36 PM
        
        Happy endings... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/6/2006 12:48:14 AM
        
        re: It's been real. It's been fun - Johannes - 10/6/2006 9:21:16 PM
        
        No need for regrets. Just defintion. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 5:46:57 PM
        
        To clarify... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 6:14:52 PM
        
        Then you need to study the quantum world - alcaray - 10/5/2006 6:50:18 PM
        
        re: Then you need to study the quantum world - Michael Gmirkin - 10/6/2006 12:55:15 AM
        
        I don't believe that this disputes what you say. - alcaray - 10/5/2006 3:56:00 PM
        
        No, it doesn't- it perfectly illustrates it! - DL - 10/5/2006 7:07:20 PM
        
        re: I don't believe that this disputes what you say. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 5:08:26 PM
        
        I know I'm not qualified - alcaray - 10/5/2006 6:12:58 PM
        
        I won't dispute that. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 7:43:36 PM
        
        You know, - alcaray - 10/5/2006 8:59:09 PM
        
        Heh. Yeah, I know. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 10:00:58 PM
        
        Read DL's post again, sleep with it under your pillow for a few weeks. - Tony - 10/5/2006 5:31:51 PM
        
        I've read it. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 7:37:28 PM
        
        I've printed this, and saved it elsewhere. Thank you, Davin. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 10/5/2006 3:34:16 PM
        
        Archived here, too (n/t) - Fox - 10/8/2006 5:08:58 PM
        
        and thank you, MA (n/t) - YetiMaster - 10/5/2006 8:54:00 PM
        
        mass is that which resists accelleration - alcaray - 10/3/2006 10:30:27 PM
        
        re: mass is that which resists accelleration - Michael Gmirkin - 10/3/2006 10:53:30 PM
        
        re: mass is that which resists accelleration - alcaray - 10/4/2006 9:15:27 PM
        
        re: mass is that which resists accelleration - Michael Gmirkin - 10/5/2006 9:10:16 PM
        
        The same body can do many things at once - alcaray - 10/5/2006 9:55:57 PM
        
        Fair enough... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/6/2006 12:42:56 AM
        
        You are certainly allowed to divide by zero. - alcaray - 10/6/2006 2:30:18 PM
        
        Thick as a brick - ER - 10/2/2006 9:29:32 PM
        
        Good examples. Thx. :) - Michael Gmirkin - 10/4/2006 12:31:21 AM
        
        You are asking all the questions backwards. - ER - 10/4/2006 4:18:29 AM
    - Well done, but probably a waste of time.... - Boo! - 9/24/2006 10:59:30 PM
    - re: An example problem - Bowser - 9/24/2006 6:22:10 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (68 posts)