Agreed, probably wouldn't work for large-scale systems like planets, the sun. Those would probably be gross over-generalizations on my part. I guess I was just thinking in terms of really oversimplified systems, just in terms of geometric relations of a way-overidealized "sphere of energy" and how mass would be affected if it was compressed or expanded, and how it might interact with other spheres of energy in a very simple and overgeneralized way. Like two beach balls hitting each other or something along that line. Obviously as you get lots of beach balls all interacting they do much more complex things in the grander structure of things. I guess I was just wondering if no an extremely basic level that geometric relationship might be semi-close to how stuff works... Or even at the smallest level (like, the size of an electron or a photon) is there all sorts of harmonic stuff going on there too? I know, it would be too easy if everythign were just nice simple spheres, deformations and "energy pressure," or something. Obviously if there's lots of tiny particles interacting all the time, they'd probably never be perfectly spherical, and they'd probably always be deformed in some way as they interact over distances (atomic, or stellar). So, probably everything is in flux all the time, more like an ideal fluid, really. But we won't go into magnetohydrodynamics. Not ready to wrap my head around any of that yet. ;o) Too late at night for that, anyway.
Off Topic » in reply to Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc.
re: Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc.
The whole thread (68 posts)
- E=M*(C^2) question?
- re: E=M*(C^2) question?
- re: E=M*(C^2) question?
- An example problem
- re: An example problem
- mass and matter
- Interesting... I think I get what I was trying to articulate now... ;o]
- Mass & Energy, Planet size, etc.
- You've lost me.
- Like car keys, you're always in the last place I look... =o]
- Of course they are...
- This is not the place...
- This is as good a place as any. ;o]
- re: This is as good a place as any. ;o]
- re: Good explanations and questions, thank you Michael.
- The answer is, you can't.
- Ohh, sure you can... You just have to be creative. =o] (I think I get it now, BTW; read on)
- Probably going to regret this.... for Johannes, Gmirkin, SDAI etc etc: Math, Science, Reality and Language
- mass is that which resists accelleration
- Thick as a brick
- Ohh, sure you can... You just have to be creative. =o] (I think I get it now, BTW; read on)
- The answer is, you can't.
- This is as good a place as any. ;o]
- Like car keys, you're always in the last place I look... =o]
- Interesting... I think I get what I was trying to articulate now... ;o]
- mass and matter
- Well done, but probably a waste of time....
- re: An example problem
- re: An example problem
- An example problem
