Tom, citing an essay written by some rightest individual isn't evidence. It's simply one person's opinion and a very slanted one. I've seen other documents taking nearly all of those rebuttals and finding the holes in them as well. My contention is that the overall conclusions that Moore came to in his movie have come absolutely true.

His portrayals of the individuals involved in the administration, most of which come from footage of them relaying their own thoughts and words, are chilling accounts of the personality traits we've seen since. I could care less what background narrative Moore might have used in between the shots. These callous and idiotic people were the movie and MM caught them with their pants down and shone the spotlight on them. Their actions since have shown them to be exactly the people he pointed out and no amount of right wing blather from you can dispute that in the eyes of intelligent people that have a clue about human nature.

Somehow you seem to forget that a documentary is still art and has the absolute right to include the political message the creator wants to push. What you fail to see is that the film could've been shown without a word spoken from Moore and would've been just as much of an indictment of the idiots he exposed.

Since the film, evidence has piled up to indicate even more that elections were manipulated and stolen, that the reasons for going to war were faked, and that there was enough evidence that 9/11 was going to happen that even the Keystone Kops could've been prepared for it. If anything Moore didn't include enough. Once again you never see the big picture.

Art